Radeon RX 6850M XTVSGeForce RTX 4080
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6850M XT+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 6850M XT
VSWINNERRadeon RX 6850M XT0%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
RTX 4080
الأداء5865
الكفاءة10068
Data confidence6075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5865
10068
8088
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→معدات صناع البث
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRadeon RX 6850M XT0No verified public setup yet
NVIDIARTX 40800No verified public setup yet
نتيجة المقارنة
The devices received the same overall score
Radeon RX 6850M XT leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 4080 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 6850M XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 51–56of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6850M XT
0 إعجابHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 4080
71/100 · Price $1199The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
النتيجة الإجمالية
نظرة عامة
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
58
65Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
51
60Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
52
57Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
68
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67
67
المقارنة الكاملة
المواصفات
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
ArchitectureRDNA 2Ada Lovelace
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Тип GPUDiscreteДискретный
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
TFLOPS13.2148.74Better
Launch price—$1199
Transistor count17200 million45900 millionBetter
Die size335 mm²379 mm²Better
Shader units / cores25609728Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL1 128 KB, L2 64 MB
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Clock speed2321–2581 MHzBetter2205 - 2505 MHz
Base clock2321 MHzBetter2205 MHz
Boost clock2581 MHzBetter2505 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6XBetter
VRAM capacity12 GB16 GBBetter
تردد الذاكرة2250 MHzBetter22,4 GHz
Memory bus192 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth432 GB/s717 GB/sBetter
Power connectorNone16 pin
Power consumption165 WBetter320 W
TDP165 WBetter320 W
Process node7 nm5 nmBetter
Release date2022-01-042022
Recommended PSU—700 W
Length—310 mm
ThicknessIGPTriple-slot
إطارات الألعاب
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100586511%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10065719%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100647110%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100808810%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006838%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100687510%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100677410%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100647110%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100707811%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100657210%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
معلومات أساسية
ArchitectureRDNA 2Ada Lovelace
Process node7 nm5 nmأفضل
Release date2022-01-042022
Launch price—$1199
المواصفات التفصيلية
Transistor count17200 million45900 millionأفضل
Die size335 mm²379 mm²أفضل
Shader units / cores25609728أفضل
Base clock2321 MHzأفضل2205 MHz
Boost clock2581 MHzأفضل2505 MHz
الشكل والتوافق
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length—310 mm
ThicknessIGPTriple-slot
Recommended PSU—700 W
Power connectorNone16 pin
سعة ونوع ذاكرة الفيديو
VRAM12 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6Xأفضل
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus192 bit256 bitأفضل
Memory bandwidth432 GB/s717 GB/sأفضل
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL1 128 KB, L2 64 MB
التوصيلات والمخارج
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
توافق API وSDK
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6مقارنات أخرى
المراجعات والأسئلة
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
تجارب المالكين
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
الأسئلة الشائعة عن المقارنة
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6850M XT or RTX 4080?+
Radeon RX 6850M XT has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 4080 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6850M XT offers more overall performance, while RTX 4080 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 4080 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6850M XT leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 4080 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 4080 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6850M XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6850M XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6850M XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.