Radeon 740M 8500GVSRadeon 740M 8300G
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
🎮 In 0 Spielen getestet▣ 3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4K↗ Aktuelle Katalogdaten♢ Testing methodology
♜ SIEGERRadeon 740M 8500G+5%Bessere Gesamtleistung
AMD
740M 8500G
VSSIEGER740M 8500G5%H2H-Gesamtindex
AMD
740M 8300G
Leistung8075
Preis / Leistung100100
Data confidence3030
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Price / performance
8075
100100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIZIERTE DATEN
Streamer-Setups öffnen→Hardware von Streamern
Echte öffentliche Setups, die mit jedem Gerät verknüpft sind.
AMD740M 8500G0Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
AMD740M 8300G0Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
740M 8500G is the best overall choice
740M 8500G leads in combined gaming performance. 740M 8500G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
740M 8500G leads in the combined performance index
Prices are identical
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 2–7of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon 740M 8500G
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon 740M 8500G
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
80Better
75
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
64Better
60
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
62Better
58
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
78Better
74
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
85Better
81
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
TDP——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
TFLOPS2.872.87
Power connector——
Power consumption——
Process node4 nm4 nm
Release date20232023
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Memory cache——
Clock speed800 - 2800 MHz800 - 2600 MHz
Video memory- SMA- SMA
Memory typeSMASMA
Memory clock——
Memory bus——
Bandwidth——
InterfaceIGPIGP
Shader units / Cores——
Base clock800 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock2800 MHzBetter2600 MHz
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10080756%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10082776%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10080756%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10080756%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10080756%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10080756%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10080756%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10080756%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node4 nm4 nm
Release date20232023
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / Cores——
Base clock800 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock2800 MHzBesser2600 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfaceIGPIGP
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory- SMA- SMA
Memory typeSMASMA
Memory bus——
TFLOPS2.872.87
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
205NVIDIABewertungen und Fragen
KI-ERKLÄRUNG · HEAD TO HEAD
Diesen Vergleich erklären
Mehr als Prozentwerte: Ursachen, relevante Spezifikationen und praktische Auswirkungen hinter jedem Diagramm.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
ECHTE KONFIGURATIONEN
Erfahrungen von Besitzern
Echte Builds, Ergebnisse und Community-Feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 740M 8500G or 740M 8300G?+
740M 8500G has the higher overall gaming score, while 740M 8500G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
740M 8500G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
740M 8500G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
740M 8500G offers more overall performance, while 740M 8500G offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
740M 8500G is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
740M 8500G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
740M 8500G leads in combined 1440p performance. 740M 8500G can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
740M 8500G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
740M 8500G is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
740M 8500G is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 740M 8500G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.