Intel Arc A380VSRadeon RX 5500 XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A380+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Arc A380
VSWINNERArc A3800%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 5500 XT
Leistung4141
Effizienz100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4141
100100
100100
6068
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelArc A3800No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 5500 XT0No verified public setup yet
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A380 leads in combined gaming performance. Arc A380 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
RX 5500 XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 73–78of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A380
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A380
100/100 · Price $139The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
41
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34
36Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63
63
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Clock speed300 - 2000 MHz1607 - 1845 MHzBetter
Base clock300 MHz1607 MHzBetter
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter1845 MHz
VRAM6 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity6 GB8 GBBetter
Speichertakt15,5 GHzBetter14 GHz
Memory bus96 bit128 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth186 GB/s224 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Power connector6 pin8 pinBetter
Power consumption75 WBetter130 W
TDP75 WBetter130 W
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2022Better2019
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS4.1985.196Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10041410%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10048480%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10050536%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10049526%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10046496%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10052567%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node6 nmBesser7 nm
Release date2022Besser2019
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock300 MHz1607 MHzBesser
Boost clock2000 MHzBesser1845 MHz
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
InterfacePCIe 4x8PCIe 4x8
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6 pin8 pinBesser
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM6 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6Besser
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus96 bit128 bitBesser
Memory bandwidth186 GB/s224 GB/sBesser
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
205NVIDIABewertungen und Fragen
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A380 or RX 5500 XT?+
Arc A380 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A380 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A380 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A380 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A380 offers more overall performance, while RX 5500 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 5500 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A380 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A380 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 5500 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A380 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A380 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A380 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A380 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.