GeForce GTX 1660VSTITAN Xp
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce GTX 1660+9%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1660
VSWINNERGTX 16608%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
TITAN Xp
Leistung3848
Effizienz10064
Price / Performance10079
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIANVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3848
10064
10079
6080
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIAGTX 16600No verified public setup yet
NVIDIATITAN Xp0No verified public setup yet
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
GTX 1660 is the best overall choice
GTX 1660 leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1660 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
GTX 1660 leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1660 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 87–92of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1660
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1660
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38
48Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
44Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31
39Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
64
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
57
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1530 - 1785 MHzBetter1480 - 1582 MHz
Base clock1530 MHzBetter1480 MHz
Boost clock1785 MHzBetter1582 MHz
VRAM6 GB GDDR512 GB GDDR5XBetter
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
VRAM capacity6 GB12 GBBetter
Speichertakt8 GHz11,4 GHzBetter
Memory bus192 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s547 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Power connector8 pinBetter6+8 pin
Power consumption120 WBetter250 W
TDP120 WBetter250 W
Process node12 nmBetter16 nm
Release date2019Better2016
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS5.02712.15Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100384823%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100455316%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100445726%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100608029%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006444%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100486225%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100476126%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100445726%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100506526%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100455825%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node12 nmBesser16 nm
Release date2019Besser2016
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1530 MHzBesser1480 MHz
Boost clock1785 MHzBesser1582 MHz
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8 pinBesser6+8 pin
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM6 GB GDDR512 GB GDDR5XBesser
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Memory bus192 bit384 bitBesser
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s547 GB/sBesser
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
740M 8300GAMDBewertungen und Fragen
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1660 or TITAN Xp?+
GTX 1660 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1660 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1660 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1660 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1660 offers more overall performance, while TITAN Xp offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1660 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1660 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1660 leads in combined 1440p performance. TITAN Xp can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1660 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1660 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1660 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1660 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.