Intel Iris Xe DG1VSGeForce GT 1030
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Iris Xe DG1+2%Better overall performance
Intel
Iris Xe DG1
VSWINNERIris Xe DG12%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
GT 1030
Leistung3230
Effizienz100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3230
100100
100100
5056
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelIris Xe DG10No verified public setup yet
NVIDIAGT 10300No verified public setup yet
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
Iris Xe DG1 is the best overall choice
Iris Xe DG1 leads in combined gaming performance. Iris Xe DG1 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Iris Xe DG1 leads in the combined performance index
GT 1030 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 125–130of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Iris Xe DG1
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GT 1030
100/100 · Price $89The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32Better
30
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
26Better
23
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27Better
26
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
57
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed900 - 1650 MHz1227 - 1519 MHzBetter
Base clock900 MHz1227 MHzBetter
Boost clock1650 MHzBetter1519 MHz
VRAM4 GB LPDDR4XBetter2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR5Better
VRAM capacity4 GBBetter2 GB
Speichertakt4,3 GHz6 GHzBetter
Memory bus128 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth69 GB/sBetter48 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x8BetterPCIe 3x4
Power connector--
Power consumption30 W30 W
TDP30 W30 W
Process node10 nmBetter16 nm
Release date2022Better2017
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS2.53Better1.127
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10032306%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10038373%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10037370%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100505611%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10040425%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10039403%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10037370%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10042445%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10037383%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node10 nmBesser16 nm
Release date2022Besser2017
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock900 MHz1227 MHzBesser
Boost clock1650 MHzBesser1519 MHz
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
InterfacePCIe 4x8BesserPCIe 3x4
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector--
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM4 GB LPDDR4XBesser2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR5Besser
Memory bus128 bitBesser64 bit
Memory bandwidth69 GB/sBesser48 GB/s
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
740M 8300GAMDBewertungen und Fragen
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Iris Xe DG1 or GT 1030?+
Iris Xe DG1 has the higher overall gaming score, while Iris Xe DG1 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GT 1030 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GT 1030 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Iris Xe DG1 offers more overall performance, while Iris Xe DG1 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GT 1030 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Iris Xe DG1 leads in combined 1440p performance. Iris Xe DG1 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Iris Xe DG1 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Iris Xe DG1 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Iris Xe DG1 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Iris Xe DG1 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.