Radeon RX 6800MVSGeForce 205
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6800M+2%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 6800M
VSWINNERRadeon RX 6800M2%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
205
Leistung5440
Effizienz100100
Data confidence6075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
5440
100100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIZIERTE DATEN
Streamer-Setups öffnen→Hardware von Streamern
Echte öffentliche Setups, die mit jedem Gerät verknüpft sind.
AMDRadeon RX 6800M0Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
NVIDIA2050Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
Radeon RX 6800M is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 6800M leads in combined gaming performance. 205 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 6800M leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 6800M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 39–44of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6800M
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 205
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
54Better
40
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45Better
35
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
43Better
33
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64Better
63
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.2Better10.0
Vulkan1.4—
OpenGL4.6Better3.3
TFLOPS12.24Better0.045
TDP145 W31 WBetter
ArchitectureRDNA 2Tesla
Memory typeGDDR6BetterDDR2
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1—
Launch price—$79
Shader units / Cores2560Better16
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16BetterPCIe 2x16
Power connectorNoneNone
Release date2021-05-31Better2009
Recommended PSU——
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Die size335 mm²Better144 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB—
Clock speed2116–2390 MHzBetter589 MHz
Base clock2116 MHzBetter589 MHz
Boost clock2390 MHzBetter589 MHz
Video memory12 GB GDDR6512 MB DDR2Better
VRAM capacity12 GB512 MBBetter
Memory clock2000 MHzBetter800 MHz
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
Bandwidth384 GB/s6400 GB/sBetter
Power consumption145 WBetter31 W
Process node7 nm40 nmBetter
Transistor count17200 millionBetter314 million
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100544030%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100593648%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100544030%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100544030%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100544030%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100544030%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100544030%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100544030%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node——
Release date——
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock——
Boost clock——
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
Interface——
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector——
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM——
Memory type——
Memory bus——
Memory bandwidth——
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX12.2Besser10.0
Vulkan1.4—
OpenGL4.6Besser3.3
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
Bewertungen und Fragen
KI-ERKLÄRUNG · HEAD TO HEAD
Diesen Vergleich erklären
Mehr als Prozentwerte: Ursachen, relevante Spezifikationen und praktische Auswirkungen hinter jedem Diagramm.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
ECHTE KONFIGURATIONEN
Erfahrungen von Besitzern
Echte Builds, Ergebnisse und Community-Feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6800M or 205?+
Radeon RX 6800M has the higher overall gaming score, while 205 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
205 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
205 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6800M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 6800M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
205 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
205 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6800M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 6800M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 6800M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
205 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
205 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6800M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.