Radeon RX 6800MVSGeForce RTX 3090
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6800M+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 6800M
VSWINNERRadeon RX 6800M0%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
RTX 3090
Leistung5463
Effizienz10060
Data confidence6075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5463
10060
80100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware der Streamer
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRadeon RX 6800M0No verified public setup yet
NVIDIARTX 30900No verified public setup yet
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
The devices received the same overall score
Radeon RX 6800M leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 3090 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 6800M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 72–77of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6800M
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 3090
71/100 · Price $1499The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
54
63Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
48
65Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49
55Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
64
64
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
ArchitectureRDNA 2Ampere
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Тип GPUDiscreteДискретный
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
TFLOPS12.2435.58Better
Launch price—$1499
Transistor count17200 million28300 millionBetter
Die size335 mm²628 mm²Better
Shader units / cores256010496Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL1 128 KB, L2 6 MB
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Clock speed2116–2390 MHzBetter1395 - 1695 MHz
Base clock2116 MHzBetter1395 MHz
Boost clock2390 MHzBetter1695 MHz
VRAM12 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6XBetter
VRAM capacity12 GB24 GBBetter
Speichertakt2000 MHzBetter19,5 GHz
Memory bus192 bit384 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s936 GB/sBetter
Power connectorNone16 pin
Power consumption145 WBetter350 W
TDP145 WBetter350 W
Process node7 nmBetter8 nm
Release date2021-05-31Better2020
Recommended PSU—750 W
Length—336 mm
ThicknessIGPTriple-slot
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100546315%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10062689%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100617318%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1008010022%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001006050%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100668019%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100647820%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100617318%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100688320%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100627418%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
ArchitectureRDNA 2Ampere
Process node7 nmBesser8 nm
Release date2021-05-31Besser2020
Launch price—$1499
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count17200 million28300 millionBesser
Die size335 mm²628 mm²Besser
Shader units / cores256010496Besser
Base clock2116 MHzBesser1395 MHz
Boost clock2390 MHzBesser1695 MHz
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length—336 mm
ThicknessIGPTriple-slot
Recommended PSU—750 W
Power connectorNone16 pin
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM12 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6XBesser
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus192 bit384 bitBesser
Memory bandwidth384 GB/s936 GB/sBesser
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 3 MBL1 128 KB, L2 6 MB
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
Bewertungen und Fragen
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Erfahrungen von Besitzern
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6800M or RTX 3090?+
Radeon RX 6800M has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3090 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3090 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3090 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6800M offers more overall performance, while RTX 3090 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3090 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3090 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6800M leads in combined 1440p performance. RTX 3090 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RTX 3090 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6800M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6800M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6800M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.