Radeon RX 7600MVSGeForce RTX 3060 8GB
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
🎮 In 0 Spielen getestet▣ 3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4K↗ Aktuelle Katalogdaten♢ Testing methodology
♜ SIEGERRadeon RX 7600M+7%Bessere Gesamtleistung
AMD
Radeon RX 7600M
VSSIEGERRadeon RX 7600M7%H2H-Gesamtindex
NVIDIA
RTX 3060 8GB
Leistung4736
Effizienz10071
Data confidence4560
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
4736
10071
COMMUNITY · VERIFIZIERTE DATEN
Streamer-Setups öffnen→Hardware von Streamern
Echte öffentliche Setups, die mit jedem Gerät verknüpft sind.
AMDRadeon RX 7600M0Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
NVIDIARTX 3060 8GB0Noch kein verifiziertes öffentliches Setup
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
Radeon RX 7600M is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 7600M leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 3060 8GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 7600M leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 7600M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 97–102of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7600M
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
100/100 · Price $399The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
47Better
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
38Better
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
71
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59Better
55
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS17.27Better12.74
TDP90 WBetter170 W
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ampere
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
Launch price—$399
Shader units / Cores17923584Better
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Power connectorNone8 pin
Release date2023-01-042022
Recommended PSU—450 W
Length—242 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Die size204 mm²Better276 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
Clock speed1500–2410 MHzBetter1320 - 1777 MHz
Base clock1500 MHzBetter1320 MHz
Boost clock2410 MHzBetter1777 MHz
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory clock2000 MHzBetter15 GHz
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Bandwidth256 GB/sBetter240 GB/s
Power consumption90 WBetter170 W
Process node6 nmBetter8 nm
Transistor count13300 millionBetter12000 million
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100473627%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100534028%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100473627%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007134%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100473627%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100473627%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100473627%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100473627%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100473627%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.6
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ampere
Process node6 nmBesser8 nm
Release date2023-01-042022
Detailed specifications
Transistor count13300 millionBesser12000 million
Die size204 mm²Besser276 mm²
Shader units / Cores17923584Besser
Base clock1500 MHzBesser1320 MHz
Boost clock2410 MHzBesser1777 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length—242 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSU—450 W
Power connectorNone8 pin
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS17.27Besser12.74
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
Bewertungen und Fragen
KI-ERKLÄRUNG · HEAD TO HEAD
Diesen Vergleich erklären
Mehr als Prozentwerte: Ursachen, relevante Spezifikationen und praktische Auswirkungen hinter jedem Diagramm.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
ECHTE KONFIGURATIONEN
Erfahrungen von Besitzern
Echte Builds, Ergebnisse und Community-Feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7600M or RTX 3060 8GB?+
Radeon RX 7600M has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 3060 8GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 3060 8GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 3060 8GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7600M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7600M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 3060 8GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 3060 8GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7600M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7600M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7600M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7600M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7600M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7600M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.