Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700GVSRadeon RX 6950 XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon Vega II 8CU 4700G+13%Better overall performance
AMD
Vega II 8CU 4700G
VSWINNERVega II 8CU 4700G12%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 6950 XT
Leistung6060
Price / Performance10071
Data confidence3075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Price / performance
6060
10071
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDVega II 8CU 4700G0No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 6950 XT0No verified public setup yet
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
Vega II 8CU 4700G is the best overall choice
Vega II 8CU 4700G leads in combined gaming performance. Vega II 8CU 4700G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Vega II 8CU 4700G leads in the combined performance index
Vega II 8CU 4700G costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 36–41of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Vega II 8CU 4700G
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
60
60
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
50
56Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
47
47
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
63Better
60
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
70Better
62
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed400 - 2100 MHz1925 - 2324 MHzBetter
Base clock400 MHz1925 MHzBetter
Boost clock2100 MHz2324 MHzBetter
VRAM- SMA16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
VRAM capacity-16 GB
Speichertakt-18 GHz
Memory bus-256 bit
Memory bandwidth—576 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x16
Power connector-8+8 pin
Power consumption-335 W
TDP-335 W
Process node7 nm7 nm
Release date20202022Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS2.123.65Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10060600%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10062678%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100088200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100060200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100607320%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100607117%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100607522%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node7 nm7 nm
Release date20202022Besser
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock400 MHz1925 MHzBesser
Boost clock2100 MHz2324 MHzBesser
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector-8+8 pin
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM- SMA16 GB GDDR6
Memory typeSMAGDDR6
Memory bus-256 bit
Memory bandwidth—576 GB/s
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
205NVIDIABewertungen und Fragen
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Vega II 8CU 4700G or RX 6950 XT?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G has the higher overall gaming score, while Vega II 8CU 4700G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G offers more overall performance, while RX 6950 XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 6950 XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 6950 XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Vega II 8CU 4700G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 6950 XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 6950 XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Vega II 8CU 4700G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.