Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GBVSRadeon RX 9070 16 GB
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB+3%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 9060 XT 16GB
VSWINNERRX 9060 XT 16GB3%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 9070 16 GB
Leistung6264
Effizienz10097
Price / Performance10082
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
6264
10097
10082
8888
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX 9060 XT 16GB0No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 9070 16 GB0No verified public setup yet
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
RX 9060 XT 16GB is the best overall choice
RX 9060 XT 16GB leads in combined gaming performance. RX 9060 XT 16GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 9060 XT 16GB leads in the combined performance index
RX 9060 XT 16GB costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 6–11of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
100/100 · Price $349The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
62
64Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
57
59Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49
50Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
97
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
76Better
74
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1700 - 3130 MHzBetter1330 - 2520 MHz
Base clock1700 MHzBetter1330 MHz
Boost clock3130 MHzBetter2520 MHz
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity16 GB16 GB
Speichertakt20 GHz20 GHz
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s640 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 5x16
Power connector8 pin8+8 pin
Power consumption160 WBetter220 W
TDP160 WBetter220 W
Process node4 nmBetter5 nm
Release date20252025
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS25.6436.13Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10062643%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10072711%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10069713%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100100973%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10074751%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10072743%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10069713%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10076771%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10070711%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node4 nmBesser5 nm
Release date20252025
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1700 MHzBesser1330 MHz
Boost clock3130 MHzBesser2520 MHz
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 5x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8 pin8+8 pin
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBesser
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s640 GB/sBesser
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
205NVIDIABewertungen und Fragen
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 9060 XT 16GB or RX 9070 16 GB?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 9060 XT 16GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB offers more overall performance, while RX 9060 XT 16GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 9060 XT 16GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 9060 XT 16GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 9060 XT 16GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.