Radeon RX Vega 56VSRadeon RX 560 2GB
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX Vega 56+2%Better overall performance
AMD
RX Vega 56
VSWINNERRX Vega 562%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 560 2GB
Leistung4129
Effizienz65100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4129
65100
100100
6856
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX Vega 560No verified public setup yet
AMDRX 560 2GB0No verified public setup yet
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
RX Vega 56 is the best overall choice
RX Vega 56 leads in combined gaming performance. RX Vega 56 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX Vega 56 leads in the combined performance index
RX 560 2GB costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 133–138of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX Vega 56
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 560 2GB
100/100 · Price $179The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
41Better
29
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
36Better
22
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
34Better
25
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
65
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57Better
56
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1156 - 1471 MHz1175 - 1275 MHzBetter
Base clock1156 MHz1175 MHzBetter
Boost clock1471 MHzBetter1275 MHz
VRAM8 GB HBM2Better2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeHBM2GDDR5Better
VRAM capacity8 GBBetter2 GB
Speichertakt1,6 GHz7 GHzBetter
Memory bus2048 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth410 GB/sBetter112 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x8
Power connector8+8 pinBetter6 pin
Power consumption210 W75 WBetter
TDP210 W75 WBetter
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20172017
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS10.54Better2.611
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100412934%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100463527%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100493631%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100685619%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1006510042%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100534126%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100524026%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100493631%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100564424%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100493728%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20172017
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1156 MHz1175 MHzBesser
Boost clock1471 MHzBesser1275 MHz
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x8
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8+8 pinBesser6 pin
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM8 GB HBM2Besser2 GB GDDR5
Memory typeHBM2GDDR5Besser
Memory bus2048 bitBesser128 bit
Memory bandwidth410 GB/sBesser112 GB/s
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
205NVIDIABewertungen und Fragen
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX Vega 56 or RX 560 2GB?+
RX Vega 56 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX Vega 56 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX Vega 56 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX Vega 56 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX Vega 56 offers more overall performance, while RX Vega 56 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX Vega 56 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX Vega 56 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX Vega 56 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX Vega 56 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX Vega 56 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 560 2GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 560 2GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX Vega 56 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.