Radeon Vega II 7CU 4600GVSATI Radeon HD 3730
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon Vega II 7CU 4600G+2%Better overall performance
AMD
Vega II 7CU 4600G
VSWINNERVega II 7CU 4600G2%H2H overall index
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 3730
Leistung5442
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence3075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Price / performance
5442
100100
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDVega II 7CU 4600G0No verified public setup yet
AMDATI Radeon HD 37300No verified public setup yet
VERGLEICHSERGEBNIS
Vega II 7CU 4600G is the best overall choice
Vega II 7CU 4600G leads in combined gaming performance. Vega II 7CU 4600G offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Vega II 7CU 4600G leads in the combined performance index
ATI Radeon HD 3730 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 65–70of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon Vega II 7CU 4600G
0 LikesHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 3730
100/100 · Price $59The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
GESAMTWERTUNG
Übersicht
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
54Better
42
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
45
100Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
43Better
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
58
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
65Better
64
VOLLSTÄNDIGER VERGLEICH
Spezifikationen
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed400 - 1900 MHz722 MHzBetter
Base clock400 MHz722 MHzBetter
Boost clock1900 MHzBetter722 MHz
VRAM- SMA512 MB DDR2
Memory typeSMADDR2
VRAM capacity-512 MB
Speichertakt-792 Мгц
Memory bus-128 bit
Memory bandwidth—12672 GB/s
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2x16
Power connector--
Power consumption-65 W
TDP-65 W
Process node7 nmBetter55 nm
Release date2020Better2008
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS1.9Better0.173
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
Gaming-FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100544225%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100563546%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100543445%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100013200%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1000100200%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100542960%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100543057%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100543445%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100542670%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100543348%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Grundinformationen
Architecture——
Process node7 nmBesser55 nm
Release date2020Besser2008
Launch price——
Detaillierte Spezifikationen
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock400 MHz722 MHzBesser
Boost clock1900 MHzBesser722 MHz
Formfaktor und Kompatibilität
InterfaceIGPPCIe 2x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector--
VRAM-Kapazität und -Typ
VRAM- SMA512 MB DDR2
Memory typeSMADDR2
Memory bus-128 bit
Memory bandwidth—12672 GB/s
Memory cache——
Anschlüsse und Ausgänge
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API- und SDK-Kompatibilität
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Weitere Vergleiche
205NVIDIABewertungen und Fragen
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Häufige Fragen zum Vergleich
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Vega II 7CU 4600G or ATI Radeon HD 3730?+
Vega II 7CU 4600G has the higher overall gaming score, while Vega II 7CU 4600G offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Vega II 7CU 4600G is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Vega II 7CU 4600G is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Vega II 7CU 4600G offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 3730 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Vega II 7CU 4600G is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Vega II 7CU 4600G leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 3730 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Vega II 7CU 4600G is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 3730 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Vega II 7CU 4600G if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.