AMD Ryzen Embedded 7945VSIntel Core Ultra 9 285T
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERAMD Ryzen Embedded 7945+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Ryzen Embedded 7945
VSWINNERRyzen Embedded 79451%H2H overall index
Intel
Core Ultra 9 285T
Performances6268
Efficacité10076
Data confidence6262
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDIntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
6268
9090
6676
11
10076
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRyzen Embedded 79450No verified public setup yet
IntelCore Ultra 9 285T0No verified public setup yet
RÉSULTAT DE LA COMPARAISON
Ryzen Embedded 7945 is the best overall choice
Ryzen Embedded 7945 leads in overall performance, while Ryzen Embedded 7945 offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Ryzen Embedded 7945 leads in the combined performance index
Prices are identical
NOTE GLOBALE
Aperçu
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
62
68Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
51
55Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
49
53Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
76
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
71Better
70
COMPARAISON COMPLÈTE
Caractéristiques
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Кэш L364 MBBetter36 MB
SocketAM5LGA1851Better
PassMark47872Better39873
Cœurs / threads12 / 24Better8P+16E / 24
Clock speed3,7 - 5,4 GHzBetterP 1,4 - 5,4 GHz / E 1,2 - 4,6 GHz
Base clock3700 MHzBetter1400 MHz
Boost clock5400 MHz5400 MHz
Кэш12+64 MB40+36 MBBetter
Встроенная графикаNavi II 2CU 2,2 GHzArc Xe2 64 2 GHz
PBP / MTP65 WBetter35 / 112 W
Power consumption65 W35 / 112 WBetter
Поддержка памятиDDR5-5200DDR5-6400
Process node5 nm3 nmBetter
ArchitectureRaphaelArrow Lake
Кодовое имяRaphaelArrow Lake
Release date——
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10090900%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100667614%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10063699%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100536114%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10044489%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10049538%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100364011%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100505510%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10047518%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Questions fréquentes sur la comparaison
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen Embedded 7945 or Core Ultra 9 285T?+
Ryzen Embedded 7945 has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen Embedded 7945 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Ryzen Embedded 7945 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Ryzen Embedded 7945 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Ryzen Embedded 7945 offers more overall performance, while Ryzen Embedded 7945 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Ryzen Embedded 7945 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Ryzen Embedded 7945 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Ryzen Embedded 7945 leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen Embedded 7945 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Ryzen Embedded 7945 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core Ultra 9 285T is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core Ultra 9 285T is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Ryzen Embedded 7945 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.