GeForce GTX 1660VSRadeon RX 6550M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
🎮 Testé dans 0 jeux▣ 3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4K↗ Données actuelles du catalogue♢ Testing methodology
♜ VAINQUEURGeForce GTX 1660+27%Meilleures performances globales
NVIDIA
GTX 1660
VSWINNERGTX 166023%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6550M
Performances3834
Efficacité100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
3834
100100
6060
COMMUNAUTÉ · DONNÉES VÉRIFIÉES
Ouvrir les setups de streamers→Matériel utilisé par les streamers
Configurations publiques réelles liées à chaque appareil.
NVIDIAGTX 16600Aucun setup public vérifié pour l’instant
AMDRadeon RX 6550M0Aucun setup public vérifié pour l’instant
RÉSULTAT DE LA COMPARAISON
GTX 1660 is the best overall choice
GTX 1660 leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1660 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
GTX 1660 leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 6550M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 92–97of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1660
0 J’aimeHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1660
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
NOTE GLOBALE
Aperçu
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
38Better
34
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
31
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31Better
28
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
49
COMPARAISON COMPLÈTE
Caractéristiques
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS5.0275.816Better
TDP120 W80 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Clock speed1530 - 1785 MHz2000–2840 MHzBetter
Base clock1530 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Boost clock1785 MHz2840 MHzBetter
Video memory6 GB GDDR5Better4 GB GDDR6
Power connector8 pinNone
Release date20192023-01-04
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Max monitors——
Memory clock8 GHz2250 MHzBetter
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
Bandwidth192 GB/sBetter144 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Power consumption120 W80 WBetter
Process node12 nm6 nmBetter
Recommended PSU300 W—
Length229 mm—
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.2
Launch price$229—
Shader units / Cores1408Better1024
Die size284 mm²107 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1.5 MBL1 128 KB, L2 1 MB
Transistor count6600 millionBetter5400 million
FPS en jeu
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100383411%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10045474%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10044417%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060600%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10048464%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10047454%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10044417%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10050492%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10045427%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.2
Basic information
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2
Process node12 nm6 nmMeilleur
Release date20192023-01-04
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count6600 millionMeilleur5400 million
Die size284 mm²107 mm²Meilleur
Shader units / Cores1408Meilleur1024
Base clock1530 MHz2000 MHzMeilleur
Boost clock1785 MHz2840 MHzMeilleur
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length229 mm—
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU300 W—
Power connector8 pinNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory6 GB GDDR5Meilleur4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Memory bus192 bitMeilleur64 bit
TFLOPS5.0275.816Meilleur
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Autres comparaisons
Avis et questions
EXPLICATION IA · HEAD TO HEAD
Expliquer cette comparaison
Au-delà des pourcentages : causes, caractéristiques pertinentes et impact pratique derrière chaque graphique.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
CONFIGURATIONS RÉELLES
Expériences des propriétaires
Configurations réelles, résultats et retours de la communauté.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Questions fréquentes sur la comparaison
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1660 or Radeon RX 6550M?+
GTX 1660 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1660 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1660 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1660 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1660 offers more overall performance, while GTX 1660 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1660 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1660 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1660 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1660 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1660 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6550M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6550M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1660 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.