GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6VSRadeon RX 6600M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6600M+14%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1650 GDDR6
VSWINNERRadeon RX 6600M13%Better gaming performance
AMD
Radeon RX 6600M
प्रदर्शन3641
दक्षता100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
3641
100100
6068
समुदाय · सत्यापित डेटा
स्ट्रीमर सेटअप खोलें→स्ट्रीमर द्वारा इस्तेमाल हार्डवेयर
हर डिवाइस से जुड़े वास्तविक सार्वजनिक सेटअप।
NVIDIAGTX 1650 GDDR60अभी कोई सत्यापित सार्वजनिक सेटअप नहीं
AMDRadeon RX 6600M0अभी कोई सत्यापित सार्वजनिक सेटअप नहीं
तुलना परिणाम
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is the best overall choice
GTX 1650 GDDR6 leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1650 GDDR6 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
GTX 1650 GDDR6 leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 6600M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 1–6of 81
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
0 लाइकHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
समग्र स्कोर
अवलोकन
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36
41Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
32
36Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30
34Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
54
पूर्ण तुलना
विशेषताएँ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS2.8498.659Better
TDP75 WBetter100 W
Clock speed1410 - 1590 MHz2068–2416 MHzBetter
Base clock1410 MHz2068 MHzBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connectorNoneNone
Boost clock1590 MHz2416 MHzBetter
Video memory4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6Better
Memory clock12 GHz1750 MHzBetter
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Bandwidth192 GB/s224 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Power consumption75 WBetter100 W
Release date20202021-05-31
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$169—
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 W—
Length229 mm—
Transistor count4700 million11060 millionBetter
Shader units / Cores8961792Better
Die size200 mm²Better237 mm²
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
गेमिंग FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100364113%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100425119%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100434913%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100606813%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100475312%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100465212%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100434913%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100495613%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100434913%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Release date20202021-05-31
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count4700 million11060 millionBetter
Die size200 mm²Better237 mm²
Shader units / Cores8961792Better
Base clock1410 MHz2068 MHzBetter
Boost clock1590 MHz2416 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mm—
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU250 W—
Power connectorNoneNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS2.8498.659Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
AI व्याख्या · HEAD TO HEAD
इस तुलना को समझाएँ
प्रतिशत से आगे: हर चार्ट के कारण, महत्वपूर्ण स्पेसिफिकेशन और व्यावहारिक असर।
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
वास्तविक कॉन्फ़िगरेशन
मालिकों के अनुभव
वास्तविक बिल्ड, परिणाम और समुदाय की प्रतिक्रिया।
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
तुलना के सामान्य प्रश्न
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1650 GDDR6 or Radeon RX 6600M?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1650 GDDR6 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 offers more overall performance, while GTX 1650 GDDR6 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1650 GDDR6 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1650 GDDR6 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.