Radeon RX 7600M XTVSRadeon Pro W6800
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7600M XT+5%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 7600M XT
VSWINNERRadeon RX 7600M XT5%Better overall performance
AMD
Pro W6800
प्रदर्शन4854
दक्षता10072
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4854
10072
68100
समुदाय · सत्यापित डेटा
स्ट्रीमर सेटअप खोलें→स्ट्रीमर द्वारा इस्तेमाल हार्डवेयर
हर डिवाइस से जुड़े वास्तविक सार्वजनिक सेटअप।
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT0अभी कोई सत्यापित सार्वजनिक सेटअप नहीं
AMDPro W68000अभी कोई सत्यापित सार्वजनिक सेटअप नहीं
तुलना परिणाम
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 7600M XT leads in combined gaming performance. Pro W6800 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 7600M XT leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 7600M XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 55–60of 81
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7600M XT
0 लाइकHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Pro W6800
51/100 · Price $2499The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
समग्र स्कोर
अवलोकन
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
48
54Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
41
45Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
39
43Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
72
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60Better
57
पूर्ण तुलना
विशेषताएँ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort—6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS20.23Better17.83
TDP120 WBetter250 W
ArchitectureRDNA 3BetterRDNA 2.0
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Launch price—$2499
Shader units / Cores20483840Better
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Release date2023-01-042021
Recommended PSU—600 W
Length—267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Die size204 mm²Better520 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 128 KB, L2 4 MB
Clock speed1280–2469 MHz2075 - 2320 MHzBetter
Base clock1280 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock2469 MHzBetter2320 MHz
Video memory8 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR6Better
Memory clock2250 MHzBetter16 GHz
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Bandwidth288 GB/s512 GB/sBetter
Power consumption120 WBetter250 W
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Transistor count13300 million26800 millionBetter
गेमिंग FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100485412%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100566413%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100546721%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1006810038%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007233%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100577527%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100567225%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100546721%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100597929%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100546823%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 3BetterRDNA 2.0
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2023-01-042021
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count13300 million26800 millionBetter
Die size204 mm²Better520 mm²
Shader units / Cores20483840Better
Base clock1280 MHz2075 MHzBetter
Boost clock2469 MHzBetter2320 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length—267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSU—600 W
Power connectorNone6+8 pin
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort—6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory8 GB GDDR632 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
TFLOPS20.23Better17.83
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
GTX 1630NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI व्याख्या · HEAD TO HEAD
इस तुलना को समझाएँ
प्रतिशत से आगे: हर चार्ट के कारण, महत्वपूर्ण स्पेसिफिकेशन और व्यावहारिक असर।
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
वास्तविक कॉन्फ़िगरेशन
मालिकों के अनुभव
वास्तविक बिल्ड, परिणाम और समुदाय की प्रतिक्रिया।
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
तुलना के सामान्य प्रश्न
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7600M XT or Pro W6800?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT has the higher overall gaming score, while Pro W6800 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7600M XT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Pro W6800 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7600M XT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7600M XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7600M XT if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.