Radeon RX 560 4GBVSRadeon RX Vega 64
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 560 4GB+1%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 560 4GB
VSWINNERRX 560 4GB0%H2H overall index
AMD
RX Vega 64
प्रदर्शन2944
दक्षता10050
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
2944
10050
100100
5668
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX 560 4GB0No verified public setup yet
AMDRX Vega 640No verified public setup yet
तुलना परिणाम
The devices received the same overall score
RX 560 4GB leads in combined gaming performance. RX 560 4GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
RX 560 4GB costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 135–140of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 560 4GB
0 लाइकHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 560 4GB
100/100 · Price $179The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
समग्र स्कोर
अवलोकन
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
29
44Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
24
38Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
25
36Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
50
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
56
56
पूर्ण तुलना
विशेषताएँ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1175 - 1275 MHz1247 - 1546 MHzBetter
Base clock1175 MHz1247 MHzBetter
Boost clock1275 MHz1546 MHzBetter
VRAM4 GB GDDR58 GB HBM2Better
Memory typeGDDR5BetterHBM2
VRAM capacity4 GB8 GBBetter
मेमोरी आवृत्ति7 GHzBetter1,89 GHz
Memory bus128 bit2048 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s484 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 3x16
Power connector6 pin8+8 pinBetter
Power consumption75 WBetter295 W
TDP75 WBetter295 W
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20172017
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS2.61112.66Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
गेमिंग FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100294441%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100354933%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100365134%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100566819%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005067%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100415529%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100405430%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100365134%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100445726%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100375132%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20172017
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1175 MHz1247 MHzBetter
Boost clock1275 MHz1546 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x8PCIe 3x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6 pin8+8 pinBetter
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM4 GB GDDR58 GB HBM2Better
Memory typeGDDR5BetterHBM2
Memory bus128 bit2048 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s484 GB/sBetter
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
तुलना के सामान्य प्रश्न
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 560 4GB or RX Vega 64?+
RX 560 4GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 560 4GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 560 4GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 560 4GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 560 4GB offers more overall performance, while RX Vega 64 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX Vega 64 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 560 4GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 560 4GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX Vega 64 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 560 4GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 560 4GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 560 4GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 560 4GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.