H2H

Radeon RX 5700VSGeForce 8500 GT

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Radeon RX 5700
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 5700+2%Better overall performance
GeForce 8500 GT
AMDRX 5700

₹9,168.64Average price

VS

₹1,930.24Average price

NVIDIA8500 GT
VS
WINNERRX 57002%H2H overall index
प्रदर्शन4437
दक्षता81100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

RX 5700Radeon RX 5700AMD
8500 GTGeForce 8500 GTNVIDIA
H2H
Performance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
Performance
4437
Efficiency
81100
Price / performance
100100
Memory capacity
687
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Radeon RX 5700AMDRX 57000

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
GeForce 8500 GTNVIDIA8500 GT0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
तुलना परिणाम

RX 5700 is the best overall choice

RX 5700 leads in combined gaming performance. RX 5700 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE2%

RX 5700 leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE₹7,238

8500 GT costs less

CATALOG POSITION

Graphics card ranking

Full ranking →

The ranking is recalculated automatically from catalog data.

Positions 93–98of 723
RX 5700#95position in the GPU ranking
8500 GT#98position in the GPU ranking
COMPARISON VERDICT

Which should you choose?

Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.

COMMUNITY CHOICE

Radeon RX 5700

0 लाइक

Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.

$/FPSBEST PRICE / FPS

GeForce 8500 GT

100/100 · Price $79

The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.

समग्र स्कोर

अवलोकन

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRX 57008500 GT
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
44Better
37
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
38
100Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
81
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62Better
61
पूर्ण तुलना

विशेषताएँ

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRX 57008500 GT
Clock speed1465 - 1625 MHzBetter459 MHz
Base clock1465 MHzBetter459 MHz
Boost clock1625 MHzBetter459 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR6256 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR6BetterDDR2
VRAM capacity8 GB256 MBBetter
मेमोरी आवृत्ति14 GHz800 MHzBetter
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s12800 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x16BetterPCIe 1x16
Power connector6+8 pin-
Power consumption180 W30 WBetter
TDP180 W30 WBetter
Process node7 nmBetter80 nm
Release date2019Better2007
Architecture
Recommended PSU
Length
Thickness
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Maximum displays
Maximum resolution
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
TFLOPS7.949Better0.029
Launch price
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Memory cache

गेमिंग FPS

Loading test-rig results…

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRX 57008500 GTDifference
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100443717%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100492951%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100512955%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100687163%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1008110021%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRX 57008500 GTDifference
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100552382%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100542573%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100512955%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100572096%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100512858%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

Basic information

SpecificationsRX 57008500 GT
Architecture
Process node7 nmBetter80 nm
Release date2019Better2007
Launch price

Detailed specifications

SpecificationsRX 57008500 GT
Transistor count
Die size
Shader units / cores
Base clock1465 MHzBetter459 MHz
Boost clock1625 MHzBetter459 MHz

Form factor and compatibility

SpecificationsRX 57008500 GT
InterfacePCIe 4x16BetterPCIe 1x16
Length
Thickness
Recommended PSU
Power connector6+8 pin-

VRAM capacity and type

SpecificationsRX 57008500 GT
VRAM8 GB GDDR6256 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR6BetterDDR2
Memory bus256 bitBetter128 bit
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s12800 GB/sBetter
Memory cache

Connectivity and outputs

SpecificationsRX 57008500 GT
HDMI
DisplayPort
USB Type-C
Maximum displays
Maximum resolution

API and SDK compatibility

SpecificationsRX 57008500 GT
DirectX
Vulkan
OpenGL
Upscaling
Compute API
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER

Other comparisons

6

Reviews and questions

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARX 570062
Device B8500 GT61
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

तुलना के सामान्य प्रश्न

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: RX 5700 or 8500 GT?

RX 5700 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 5700 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

8500 GT is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

8500 GT is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

RX 5700 offers more overall performance, while 8500 GT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

8500 GT is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

RX 5700 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

RX 5700 leads in combined 1440p performance. 8500 GT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

RX 5700 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

8500 GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

8500 GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to RX 5700 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.