Radeon RX 7900MVSRadeon RX 6800
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7900M+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 7900M
VSWINNERRadeon RX 7900M0%H2H overall index
AMD
RX 6800
प्रदर्शन5755
दक्षता10073
Data confidence6075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5755
10073
8888
समुदाय · सत्यापित डेटा
स्ट्रीमर सेटअप खोलें→स्ट्रीमर द्वारा इस्तेमाल हार्डवेयर
हर डिवाइस से जुड़े वास्तविक सार्वजनिक सेटअप।
AMDRadeon RX 7900M0अभी कोई सत्यापित सार्वजनिक सेटअप नहीं
AMDRX 68000अभी कोई सत्यापित सार्वजनिक सेटअप नहीं
तुलना परिणाम
The devices received the same overall score
Radeon RX 7900M leads in combined gaming performance. RX 6800 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 7900M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 52–57of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7900M
0 लाइकHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 6800
100/100 · Price $579The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
समग्र स्कोर
अवलोकन
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
57Better
55
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
47Better
46
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
45Better
44
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
73
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67
67
पूर्ण तुलना
विशेषताएँ
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS38.52Better16.17
TDP180 WBetter250 W
ArchitectureRDNA 3BetterRDNA 2.0
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Launch price—$579
Shader units / Cores4608Better3840
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Power connectorNone8+8 pin
Release date2023-10-192020
Recommended PSU—600 W
Length—267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Die size529 mm²520 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 250 KB, L2 6 MBL1 128 KB, L2 4 MB
Clock speed1825–2090 MHzBetter1700 - 2105 MHz
Base clock1825 MHzBetter1700 MHz
Boost clock2090 MHz2105 MHzBetter
Video memory16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory clock2250 MHzBetter16 GHz
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Bandwidth576 GB/sBetter512 GB/s
Power consumption180 WBetter250 W
Process node5 nmBetter7 nm
Transistor count57700 millionBetter26800 million
गेमिंग FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10057554%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10064623%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10066643%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007331%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10071701%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10069681%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10066643%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10074731%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10066652%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 3BetterRDNA 2.0
Process node5 nmBetter7 nm
Release date2023-10-192020
Detailed specifications
Transistor count57700 millionBetter26800 million
Die size529 mm²520 mm²Better
Shader units / Cores4608Better3840
Base clock1825 MHzBetter1700 MHz
Boost clock2090 MHz2105 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length—267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSU—600 W
Power connectorNone8+8 pin
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS38.52Better16.17
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI व्याख्या · HEAD TO HEAD
इस तुलना को समझाएँ
प्रतिशत से आगे: हर चार्ट के कारण, महत्वपूर्ण स्पेसिफिकेशन और व्यावहारिक असर।
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
वास्तविक कॉन्फ़िगरेशन
मालिकों के अनुभव
वास्तविक बिल्ड, परिणाम और समुदाय की प्रतिक्रिया।
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
तुलना के सामान्य प्रश्न
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7900M or RX 6800?+
Radeon RX 7900M has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 6800 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 7900M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 7900M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7900M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7900M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 7900M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 6800 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7900M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7900M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7900M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7900M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7900M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7900M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.