Apple M1 UltraVSAMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERApple M1 Ultra+1%Better overall performance
Apple
M1 Ultra
VSWINNERM1 Ultra0%Better overall performance
AMD
Ryzen 5 7500X3D
Performa5348
Efisiensi7492
Kepercayaan data2538
Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.
Apple M1 Ultra vs AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan M1 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 7500X3D menunjukkan keunggulan 10% untuk M1 Ultra pada «performa gaming», sementara Ryzen 5 7500X3D bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
AppleAMDPerforma
Single-core
Efisiensi
5348
5375
7492
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Kedua perangkat mendapat skor keseluruhan yang sama
M1 Ultra unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara M1 Ultra menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Performa hampir sama
M1 Ultra lebih murah
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan M1 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 7500X3D dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
53Lebih baik
48
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
45Lebih baik
41
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
42Lebih baik
39
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
74
92Lebih baik
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
58
58
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan M1 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 7500X3D dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Device classDesktopDesktop
Tanggal rilis2022-03-082022
Cores / Threads20 / 20Lebih baik6 / 12
Kecepatan clockUp to 3.2 GHz4 - 4,5 GHzLebih baik
Clock dasar—4000 MHz
Boost clock3.2 GHz4500 MHzLebih baik
Cache L1——
Cache L2——
Cache L3—96 MB
Dukungan memoriUnified memory, LPDDR5, up to 128 GB, 800 GB/sDDR5-5200
Grafis terintegrasiApple 48-core / 64-core GPULebih baikNavi II 2CU 2,2 GHz
PBP / MTP60 / 90 W65 WLebih baik
Konsumsi daya90 W65 WLebih baik
PassMark—25121
Soket—AM5
Arsitektur—Raphael
Node proses—5 nm
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan M1 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 7500X3D dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100537534%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10053514%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10002200%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan M1 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 7500X3D dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100533444%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100533833%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100532959%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100533930%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100533638%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: M1 Ultra or Ryzen 5 7500X3D?+
M1 Ultra has the higher overall gaming score, while M1 Ultra offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
M1 Ultra is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
M1 Ultra is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
M1 Ultra offers more overall performance, while M1 Ultra offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
M1 Ultra is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
M1 Ultra is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
M1 Ultra leads in combined 1440p performance. M1 Ultra can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
M1 Ultra is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
M1 Ultra is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
M1 Ultra is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to M1 Ultra if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.