H2H

Apple M2 UltraVSIntel Core i9-13900

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Catalog benchmarks3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Apple M2 Ultra
♜ WINNERApple M2 Ultra+13%Better overall performance
Intel Core i9-13900
AppleM2 Ultra

Rp 0Average price

VS

Rp 12.781.153Average price

IntelCore i9-13900
VS
WINNERM2 Ultra12%Better overall performance
Performa5859
Efisiensi6634
Kepercayaan data2538

Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.

ANALISIS CEPAT

Apple M2 Ultra vs Intel Core i9-13900: kesimpulan utama

Perbandingan M2 Ultra dan Core i9-13900 menunjukkan keunggulan 2% untuk Core i9-13900 pada «performa gaming», sementara M2 Ultra bisa lebih baik pada «nilai untuk uang». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.

PROFIL RINGKAS

Radar metrik terverifikasi

Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.

M2 UltraApple M2 UltraApple
Core i9-13900Intel Core i9-13900Intel
H2H
Performa
Single-core
Efisiensi
Performa
5859
Single-core
5893
Efisiensi
6634
Nilai yang hilang tidak pernah diganti dengan nol atau rata-rata.Model: skala tetap H2H 2026.07.
HASIL PERBANDINGAN

M2 Ultra adalah pilihan terbaik secara keseluruhan

M2 Ultra unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara M2 Ultra menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.

SELISIH PERFORMA13%

M2 Ultra unggul pada indeks performa gabungan

SELISIH HARGARp 12.781.153

M2 Ultra lebih murah

SKOR KESELURUHAN

Ringkasan

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan M2 Ultra dan Core i9-13900 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

CategoryM2 UltraCore i9-13900
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
58
59Lebih baik
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
48
49Lebih baik
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
46
46
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
66Lebih baik
34
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
60Lebih baik
53
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP

Spesifikasi

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan M2 Ultra dan Core i9-13900 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

SpecificationM2 UltraCore i9-13900
Device classDesktopDesktop
Tanggal rilis2023-06-052022
Cores / Threads24 / 24Lebih baik8P+16E / 32
Kecepatan clockUp to 3.5 GHzLebih baikP 2 - 5,6 GHz / E 1,5 - 4,2 GHz
Clock dasar2000 MHz
Boost clock3.5 GHz5600 MHzLebih baik
Cache L1
Cache L2
Cache L336 MB
Dukungan memoriUnified memory, LPDDR5, up to 192 GB, 800 GB/sDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
Grafis terintegrasiApple 60-core / 76-core GPUUHD 770 1,65 GHzLebih baik
PBP / MTP70 / 110 WLebih baik65 / 219 W
Konsumsi daya110 W65 / 219 WLebih baik
PassMark50088
SoketLGA1700
ArsitekturRaptor Lake
Node proses10 nm (Intel 7)
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload H2H

Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.

Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan M2 Ultra dan Core i9-13900 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksM2 UltraCore i9-13900Selisih
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100589346%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10058627%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10001100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload AI H2H

Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.

Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan M2 Ultra dan Core i9-13900 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksM2 UltraCore i9-13900Selisih
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100584232%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100584623%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100583549%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100584721%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100584427%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD

Jelaskan perbandingan ini

Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.

Device AM2 Ultra60
Device BCore i9-1390053
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI

Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.

KONFIGURASI NYATA

Pengalaman pemilik

Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.

Ditinjau moderatorBermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Pertanyaan umum perbandingan

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: M2 Ultra or Core i9-13900?

M2 Ultra has the higher overall gaming score, while M2 Ultra offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

M2 Ultra is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

M2 Ultra is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

M2 Ultra offers more overall performance, while M2 Ultra offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

M2 Ultra is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

M2 Ultra is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

M2 Ultra leads in combined 1440p performance. M2 Ultra can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

M2 Ultra is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

M2 Ultra is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

M2 Ultra is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to M2 Ultra if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.