Apple M3 UltraVSAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERApple M3 Ultra+1%Better overall performance
Apple
M3 Ultra
VSWINNERM3 Ultra0%Better overall performance
AMD
Ryzen 5 PRO 9645
Performa6856
Efisiensi61100
Kepercayaan data2538
Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.
Apple M3 Ultra vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan M3 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 menunjukkan keunggulan 21% untuk M3 Ultra pada «performa gaming», sementara Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
AppleAMDPerforma
Single-core
Efisiensi
6856
6890
61100
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Kedua perangkat mendapat skor keseluruhan yang sama
M3 Ultra unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara M3 Ultra menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Performa hampir sama
Harga sama
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan M3 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
68Lebih baik
56
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
55Lebih baik
47
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
53Lebih baik
44
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
61
100Lebih baik
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
66
66
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan M3 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Device classDesktopDesktop
Tanggal rilis2025-03-052024
Cores / Threads32 / 32Lebih baik6 / 12
Kecepatan clockUp to 4.1 GHzLebih baik3,9 - 5,4 GHz
Clock dasar—3900 MHz
Boost clock4.1 GHz5400 MHzLebih baik
Cache L1——
Cache L2——
Cache L3—32 MB
Dukungan memoriUnified memory, up to 512 GB, 819 GB/sLebih baikDDR5-5600
Grafis terintegrasiApple 60-core / 80-core GPULebih baikNavi II 2CU 2,2 GHz
PBP / MTP80 / 140 WLebih baik65
Konsumsi daya140 W65Lebih baik
PassMark—31434
Soket—AM5
Arsitektur—Granite Ridge
Node proses—4 nm
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan M3 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100689028%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100686013%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10001100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan M3 Ultra dan Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100683954%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100684443%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100683369%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100684541%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100684247%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: M3 Ultra or Ryzen 5 PRO 9645?+
M3 Ultra has the higher overall gaming score, while M3 Ultra offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
M3 Ultra is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
M3 Ultra is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
M3 Ultra offers more overall performance, while M3 Ultra offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
M3 Ultra is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
M3 Ultra is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
M3 Ultra leads in combined 1440p performance. M3 Ultra can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
M3 Ultra is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
M3 Ultra is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
M3 Ultra is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to M3 Ultra if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.