
Intel Core i3-12100VSIntel Core i3-12100E
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
Intel
Core i3-12100

VSWINNERCore i3-121000%Better overall performance
Intel
Core i3-12100E

Performa4545
Efisiensi6363
Kepercayaan data3838
Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.
Intel Core i3-12100 vs Intel Core i3-12100E: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Core i3-12100 dan Core i3-12100E menunjukkan keunggulan 0% untuk Core i3-12100 pada «performa gaming», sementara Core i3-12100E bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
Intel
IntelPerforma
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
4545
7272
00
6363
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Kedua perangkat mendapat skor keseluruhan yang sama
Core i3-12100 unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core i3-12100 menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Performa hampir sama
Core i3-12100E lebih murah
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core i3-12100 dan Core i3-12100E dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
45
45
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
39
39
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
36
36
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
63
63
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
49
49
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core i3-12100 dan Core i3-12100E dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Cache L2——
Cache L1——
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark1351214250Lebih baik
PBP / MTP60 / 89 W60 / 89 W
Cores / Threads4P / 84P / 8
SoketLGA1700LGA1700
ArsitekturAlder LakeAlder Lake
Tanggal rilis——
Kecepatan clockP 3,3 - 4,3 GHzP 3,3 - 4,3 GHz
Clock dasar3300 MHz3300 MHz
Boost clock4300 MHz4300 MHz
Cache L312 MB12 MB
Grafis terintegrasiUHD 730 1,4 GHzUHD 730 1,4 GHz
Konsumsi daya60 / 89 W60 / 89 W
Node proses10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
Dukungan memoriDDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core i3-12100 dan Core i3-12100E dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10072720%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10048480%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core i3-12100 dan Core i3-12100E dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10032320%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10035350%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10026260%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10036360%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10034340%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core i3-12100 or Core i3-12100E?+
Core i3-12100 has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i3-12100 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core i3-12100 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core i3-12100 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core i3-12100 offers more overall performance, while Core i3-12100 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core i3-12100 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core i3-12100 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core i3-12100 leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i3-12100 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core i3-12100 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core i3-12100 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core i3-12100 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core i3-12100 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.
