H2H

Intel Core i7-13700TVSIntel Core Ultra 9 285K

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Catalog benchmarks3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Intel Core i7-13700T
♜ WINNERIntel Core i7-13700T+1%Better overall performance
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
IntelCore i7-13700T

Rp 0Average price

VS

Rp 11.750.706Average price

IntelCore Ultra 9 285K
VS
WINNERCore i7-13700T0%Better overall performance
Performa5160
Efisiensi6030
Kepercayaan data3838

Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.

ANALISIS CEPAT

Intel Core i7-13700T vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K: kesimpulan utama

Perbandingan Core i7-13700T dan Core Ultra 9 285K menunjukkan keunggulan 18% untuk Core Ultra 9 285K pada «performa gaming», sementara Core i7-13700T bisa lebih baik pada «nilai untuk uang». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.

PROFIL RINGKAS

Radar metrik terverifikasi

Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.

Core i7-13700TIntel Core i7-13700TIntel
Core Ultra 9 285KIntel Core Ultra 9 285KIntel
H2H
Performa
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
Performa
5160
Single-core
8295
Cache L3
11
Efisiensi
6030
Nilai yang hilang tidak pernah diganti dengan nol atau rata-rata.Model: skala tetap H2H 2026.07.
HASIL PERBANDINGAN

Kedua perangkat mendapat skor keseluruhan yang sama

Core i7-13700T unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core i7-13700T menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.

SELISIH PERFORMA0%

Performa hampir sama

SELISIH HARGARp 11.750.706

Core i7-13700T lebih murah

SKOR KESELURUHAN

Ringkasan

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core i7-13700T dan Core Ultra 9 285K dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

CategoryCore i7-13700TCore Ultra 9 285K
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
51
60Lebih baik
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
43
50Lebih baik
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
41
47Lebih baik
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
60Lebih baik
30
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
53
53
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP

Spesifikasi

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core i7-13700T dan Core Ultra 9 285K dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

SpecificationCore i7-13700TCore Ultra 9 285K
Tanggal rilis20222024
Cache L1
Cache L2
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark2839968241Lebih baik
PBP / MTP35 / 106 W125 / 250 WLebih baik
SoketLGA1700LGA1851Lebih baik
ArsitekturRaptor LakeArrow Lake
Cores / Threads8P+8E / 248P+16E / 24
Cache L330 MB36 MBLebih baik
Grafis terintegrasiUHD 770 1,6 GHzLebih baikArc Xe2 64 2 GHz
Konsumsi daya35 / 106 WLebih baik125 / 250 W
Node proses10 nm (Intel 7)3 nmLebih baik
Kecepatan clockP 1,4 - 4,9 GHz / E 1 - 3,6 GHzP 3,7 - 5,7 GHz / E 3,2 - 4,6 GHzLebih baik
Clock dasar1400 MHz3700 MHzLebih baik
Boost clock4900 MHz5700 MHzLebih baik
Dukungan memoriDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-6400
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload H2H

Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.

Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core i7-13700T dan Core Ultra 9 285K dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksCore i7-13700TCore Ultra 9 285KSelisih
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100829515%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100556415%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100110%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload AI H2H

Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.

Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core i7-13700T dan Core Ultra 9 285K dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksCore i7-13700TCore Ultra 9 285KSelisih
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100364215%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100404716%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100303515%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100414816%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100384517%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD

Jelaskan perbandingan ini

Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.

Device ACore i7-13700T53
Device BCore Ultra 9 285K53
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI

Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.

KONFIGURASI NYATA

Pengalaman pemilik

Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.

Ditinjau moderatorBermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Pertanyaan umum perbandingan

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i7-13700T or Core Ultra 9 285K?

Core i7-13700T has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i7-13700T offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i7-13700T is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i7-13700T is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i7-13700T offers more overall performance, while Core i7-13700T offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i7-13700T is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i7-13700T is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i7-13700T leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i7-13700T can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i7-13700T is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i7-13700T is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i7-13700T is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i7-13700T if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.