Intel Core i7-14790FVSIntel Core Ultra 5 245K
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Core i7-14790F+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Core i7-14790F
VSWINNERCore i7-14790F0%Better overall performance
Intel
Core Ultra 5 245K
Performa5654
Efisiensi3242
Kepercayaan data3838
Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.
Intel Core i7-14790F vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245K: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Core i7-14790F dan Core Ultra 5 245K menunjukkan keunggulan 4% untuk Core i7-14790F pada «performa gaming», sementara Core Ultra 5 245K bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
IntelIntelPerforma
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
5654
9087
10
3242
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Kedua perangkat mendapat skor keseluruhan yang sama
Core i7-14790F unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core i7-14790F menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Performa hampir sama
Core i7-14790F lebih murah
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core i7-14790F dan Core Ultra 5 245K dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
56Lebih baik
54
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
47Lebih baik
45
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
44Lebih baik
43
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
32
42Lebih baik
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
51
51
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core i7-14790F dan Core Ultra 5 245K dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Tanggal rilis20232024
Cache L2——
Cache L1——
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark46391Lebih baik43698
PBP / MTP65 / 219 W125 / 159 WLebih baik
Cores / Threads8P+8E / 24Lebih baik6P+8E / 14
SoketLGA1700LGA1851Lebih baik
ArsitekturRaptor Lake RefreshArrow Lake
Kecepatan clockP 2,1 - 5,4 GHz / E 1,5 - 4,2 GHzP 4,2 - 5,2 GHz / E 3,6 - 4,6 GHzLebih baik
Clock dasar2100 MHz4200 MHzLebih baik
Boost clock5400 MHzLebih baik5200 MHz
Cache L330 MBLebih baik24 MB
Konsumsi daya65 / 219 WLebih baik125 / 159 W
Node proses10 nm (Intel 7)3 nmLebih baik
Dukungan memoriDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-6400
Grafis terintegrasi—Arc Xe2 64 1,9 GHz
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core i7-14790F dan Core Ultra 5 245K dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10090873%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10060583%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core i7-14790F dan Core Ultra 5 245K dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10039383%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10044425%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10033323%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10045435%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10042412%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core i7-14790F or Core Ultra 5 245K?+
Core i7-14790F has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i7-14790F offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core i7-14790F is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core i7-14790F is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core i7-14790F offers more overall performance, while Core i7-14790F offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core i7-14790F is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core i7-14790F is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core i7-14790F leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i7-14790F can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core i7-14790F is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core i7-14790F is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core i7-14790F is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core i7-14790F if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.