Intel Core i9-13900FVSIntel Core Ultra 7 165HL
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Core i9-13900F+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Core i9-13900F
VSWINNERCore i9-13900F0%Better overall performance
Intel
Core Ultra 7 165HL
Performa5952
Efisiensi3457
Kepercayaan data3838
Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.
Intel Core i9-13900F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 165HL: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Core i9-13900F dan Core Ultra 7 165HL menunjukkan keunggulan 13% untuk Core i9-13900F pada «performa gaming», sementara Core Ultra 7 165HL bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
IntelIntelPerforma
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
5952
9383
10
3457
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Kedua perangkat mendapat skor keseluruhan yang sama
Core i9-13900F unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core i9-13900F menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Performa hampir sama
Core Ultra 7 165HL lebih murah
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core i9-13900F dan Core Ultra 7 165HL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
59Lebih baik
52
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
49Lebih baik
44
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
46Lebih baik
41
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
34
57Lebih baik
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
53
53
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core i9-13900F dan Core Ultra 7 165HL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Tanggal rilis20222023
Cache L2——
Cache L1——
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark52258—
PBP / MTP65 / 219 WLebih baik45 / 115 W
Cores / Threads8P+16E / 32Lebih baik6P+8E+2L / 22
SoketLGA1700LGA1851Lebih baik
ArsitekturRaptor LakeMeteor Lake-PS
Kecepatan clockP 2 - 5,6 GHz / E 1,5 - 4,2 GHzLebih baikP 1,4 - 5 GHz / E 0,9 - 3,8 GHz / L 0,7 - 2,5 GHz
Clock dasar2000 MHzLebih baik1400 MHz
Boost clock5600 MHzLebih baik5000 MHz
Cache L336 MBLebih baik24 MB
Konsumsi daya65 / 219 W45 / 115 WLebih baik
Node proses10 nm (Intel 7)7 nmLebih baik
Dukungan memoriDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-5600
Grafis terintegrasi—Arc Xe 128 2,3 GHz
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core i9-13900F dan Core Ultra 7 165HL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100938311%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100625610%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core i9-13900F dan Core Ultra 7 165HL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100423713%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100464111%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100353015%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100474211%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100443912%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core i9-13900F or Core Ultra 7 165HL?+
Core i9-13900F has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i9-13900F offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core i9-13900F is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core i9-13900F is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core i9-13900F offers more overall performance, while Core i9-13900F offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core i9-13900F is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core i9-13900F is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core i9-13900F leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i9-13900F can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core i9-13900F is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core i9-13900F is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core i9-13900F is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core i9-13900F if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.