H2H

Intel Core i9-13900KVSAMD Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Catalog benchmarks3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Intel Core i9-13900K
♜ WINNERIntel Core i9-13900K+2%Better overall performance
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE
IntelCore i9-13900K

Rp 11.226.444Average price

VS

Rp 0Average price

AMDAthlon Gold PRO 4150GE
VS
WINNERCore i9-13900K2%Better overall performance
Performa6140
Efisiensi30100
Kepercayaan data3838

Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.

ANALISIS CEPAT

Intel Core i9-13900K vs AMD Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE: kesimpulan utama

Perbandingan Core i9-13900K dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE menunjukkan keunggulan 53% untuk Core i9-13900K pada «performa gaming», sementara Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.

PROFIL RINGKAS

Radar metrik terverifikasi

Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.

Core i9-13900KIntel Core i9-13900KIntel
Athlon Gold PRO 4150GEAMD Athlon Gold PRO 4150GEAMD
H2H
Performa
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
Performa
6140
Single-core
9763
Cache L3
10
Efisiensi
30100
Nilai yang hilang tidak pernah diganti dengan nol atau rata-rata.Model: skala tetap H2H 2026.07.
HASIL PERBANDINGAN

Core i9-13900K adalah pilihan terbaik secara keseluruhan

Core i9-13900K unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core i9-13900K menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.

SELISIH PERFORMA2%

Core i9-13900K unggul pada indeks performa gabungan

SELISIH HARGARp 11.226.444

Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE lebih murah

SKOR KESELURUHAN

Ringkasan

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core i9-13900K dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

CategoryCore i9-13900KAthlon Gold PRO 4150GE
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
61Lebih baik
40
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
50Lebih baik
35
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
48Lebih baik
33
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
30
100Lebih baik
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
54Lebih baik
53
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP

Spesifikasi

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core i9-13900K dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

SpecificationCore i9-13900KAthlon Gold PRO 4150GE
Tanggal rilis20222022
Cache L2
Cache L1
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark59448Lebih baik7247
PBP / MTP125 / 253 WLebih baik35 W
Cores / Threads8P+16E / 32Lebih baik4
SoketLGA1700Lebih baikAM4
ArsitekturRaptor LakeRenoir
Cache L336 MBLebih baik4 MB
Kecepatan clockP 3 - 5,8 GHz / E 2,2 - 4,3 GHz3,3 - 3,8 GHzLebih baik
Clock dasar3000 MHz3300 MHzLebih baik
Boost clock5800 MHzLebih baik3800 MHz
Grafis terintegrasiUHD 770 1,65 GHzLebih baikVega 5 1,4 GHz
Konsumsi daya125 / 253 W35 WLebih baik
Node proses10 nm (Intel 7)7 nmLebih baik
Dukungan memoriDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200Lebih baikDDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload H2H

Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.

Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core i9-13900K dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksCore i9-13900KAthlon Gold PRO 4150GESelisih
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100976343%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100654243%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload AI H2H

Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.

Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core i9-13900K dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksCore i9-13900KAthlon Gold PRO 4150GESelisih
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100432842%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100483143%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100362344%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100493242%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100463042%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD

Jelaskan perbandingan ini

Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.

Device ACore i9-13900K54
Device BAthlon Gold PRO 4150GE53
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI

Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.

KONFIGURASI NYATA

Pengalaman pemilik

Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.

Ditinjau moderatorBermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Pertanyaan umum perbandingan

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core i9-13900K or Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE?

Core i9-13900K has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i9-13900K offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core i9-13900K is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core i9-13900K is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core i9-13900K offers more overall performance, while Core i9-13900K offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core i9-13900K is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core i9-13900K is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core i9-13900K leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i9-13900K can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core i9-13900K is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core i9-13900K is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core i9-13900K is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core i9-13900K if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.