Intel Core i9-14900KFVSIntel Core Ultra 3 105UL
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Core i9-14900KF+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Core i9-14900KF
VSWINNERCore i9-14900KF0%Better overall performance
Intel
Core Ultra 3 105UL
Performa6344
Efisiensi3196
Kepercayaan data3838
Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.
Intel Core i9-14900KF vs Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Core i9-14900KF dan Core Ultra 3 105UL menunjukkan keunggulan 43% untuk Core i9-14900KF pada «performa gaming», sementara Core Ultra 3 105UL bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
IntelIntelPerforma
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
6344
10070
10
3196
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Kedua perangkat mendapat skor keseluruhan yang sama
Core i9-14900KF unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core i9-14900KF menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Performa hampir sama
Core Ultra 3 105UL lebih murah
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core i9-14900KF dan Core Ultra 3 105UL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
63Lebih baik
44
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
52Lebih baik
38
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
49Lebih baik
36
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
31
96Lebih baik
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
56
56
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core i9-14900KF dan Core Ultra 3 105UL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Tanggal rilis20232023
Cache L1——
Cache L2——
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark60209Lebih baik10285
PBP / MTP125 / 253 WLebih baik15 / 57 W
SoketLGA1700LGA1851Lebih baik
Cores / Threads8P+16E / 32Lebih baik2P+4E+2L / 10
ArsitekturRaptor Lake RefreshMeteor Lake-PS
Kecepatan clockP 3,2 - 6 GHz / E 2,4 - 4,4 GHzLebih baikP 1,5 - 4,2 GHz / E 1 - 3,5 GHz / L 0,7 - 2,1 GHz
Clock dasar3200 MHzLebih baik1500 MHz
Boost clock6000 MHzLebih baik4200 MHz
Cache L336 MBLebih baik10 MB
Konsumsi daya125 / 253 W15 / 57 WLebih baik
Node proses10 nm (Intel 7)7 nmLebih baik
Dukungan memoriDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-5600
Grafis terintegrasi—Arc Xe 48 1,8 GHz
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core i9-14900KF dan Core Ultra 3 105UL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 1001007035%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100674735%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core i9-14900KF dan Core Ultra 3 105UL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100443135%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100493436%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100372635%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100513537%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100473335%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core i9-14900KF or Core Ultra 3 105UL?+
Core i9-14900KF has the higher overall gaming score, while Core i9-14900KF offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core i9-14900KF is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core i9-14900KF is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core i9-14900KF offers more overall performance, while Core i9-14900KF offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core i9-14900KF is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core i9-14900KF is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core i9-14900KF leads in combined 1440p performance. Core i9-14900KF can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core i9-14900KF is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core i9-14900KF is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core i9-14900KF is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core i9-14900KF if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.