H2H

Intel Core Ultra 3 105ULVSAMD Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Catalog benchmarks3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL
♜ WINNERIntel Core Ultra 3 105UL+6%Better overall performance
AMD Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE
IntelCore Ultra 3 105UL

Rp 0Average price

VS

Rp 0Average price

AMDAthlon Gold PRO 4150GE
VS
WINNERCore Ultra 3 105UL6%Better overall performance
Performa4440
Efisiensi96100
Kepercayaan data3838

Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.

ANALISIS CEPAT

Intel Core Ultra 3 105UL vs AMD Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE: kesimpulan utama

Perbandingan Core Ultra 3 105UL dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE menunjukkan keunggulan 10% untuk Core Ultra 3 105UL pada «performa gaming», sementara Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.

PROFIL RINGKAS

Radar metrik terverifikasi

Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.

Core Ultra 3 105ULIntel Core Ultra 3 105ULIntel
Athlon Gold PRO 4150GEAMD Athlon Gold PRO 4150GEAMD
H2H
Performa
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
Performa
4440
Single-core
7063
Cache L3
00
Efisiensi
96100
Nilai yang hilang tidak pernah diganti dengan nol atau rata-rata.Model: skala tetap H2H 2026.07.
HASIL PERBANDINGAN

Core Ultra 3 105UL adalah pilihan terbaik secara keseluruhan

Core Ultra 3 105UL unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core Ultra 3 105UL menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.

SELISIH PERFORMA6%

Core Ultra 3 105UL unggul pada indeks performa gabungan

SELISIH HARGARp 0

Harga sama

SKOR KESELURUHAN

Ringkasan

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core Ultra 3 105UL dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

CategoryCore Ultra 3 105ULAthlon Gold PRO 4150GE
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
44Lebih baik
40
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
38Lebih baik
35
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
36Lebih baik
33
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
96
100Lebih baik
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
56Lebih baik
53
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP

Spesifikasi

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core Ultra 3 105UL dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

SpecificationCore Ultra 3 105ULAthlon Gold PRO 4150GE
Cache L2
Cache L1
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark10285Lebih baik7247
PBP / MTP15 / 57 W35 WLebih baik
Cores / Threads2P+4E+2L / 104Lebih baik
SoketLGA1851Lebih baikAM4
ArsitekturMeteor Lake-PSRenoir
Tanggal rilis20232022
Kecepatan clockP 1,5 - 4,2 GHz / E 1 - 3,5 GHz / L 0,7 - 2,1 GHz3,3 - 3,8 GHzLebih baik
Clock dasar1500 MHz3300 MHzLebih baik
Boost clock4200 MHzLebih baik3800 MHz
Cache L310 MBLebih baik4 MB
Grafis terintegrasiArc Xe 48 1,8 GHzLebih baikVega 5 1,4 GHz
Konsumsi daya15 / 57 WLebih baik35 W
Node proses7 nm7 nm
Dukungan memoriDDR5-5600Lebih baikDDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload H2H

Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.

Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core Ultra 3 105UL dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksCore Ultra 3 105ULAthlon Gold PRO 4150GESelisih
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100706311%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100474211%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload AI H2H

Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.

Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core Ultra 3 105UL dan Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksCore Ultra 3 105ULAthlon Gold PRO 4150GESelisih
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100312810%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10034319%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100262312%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10035329%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100333010%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD

Jelaskan perbandingan ini

Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.

Device ACore Ultra 3 105UL56
Device BAthlon Gold PRO 4150GE53
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI

Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.

KONFIGURASI NYATA

Pengalaman pemilik

Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.

Ditinjau moderatorBermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Pertanyaan umum perbandingan

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core Ultra 3 105UL or Athlon Gold PRO 4150GE?

Core Ultra 3 105UL has the higher overall gaming score, while Core Ultra 3 105UL offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core Ultra 3 105UL is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core Ultra 3 105UL is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core Ultra 3 105UL offers more overall performance, while Core Ultra 3 105UL offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core Ultra 3 105UL is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core Ultra 3 105UL is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core Ultra 3 105UL leads in combined 1440p performance. Core Ultra 3 105UL can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core Ultra 3 105UL is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core Ultra 3 105UL is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core Ultra 3 105UL is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core Ultra 3 105UL if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.