Intel Core Ultra 3 205VSIntel Core Ultra 5 135UL
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Core Ultra 3 205+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Core Ultra 3 205
VSWINNERCore Ultra 3 2050%Better overall performance
Intel
Core Ultra 5 135UL
Performa5146
Efisiensi84100
Kepercayaan data3838
Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.
Intel Core Ultra 3 205 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135UL: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Core Ultra 3 205 dan Core Ultra 5 135UL menunjukkan keunggulan 11% untuk Core Ultra 3 205 pada «performa gaming», sementara Core Ultra 5 135UL bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
IntelIntelPerforma
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
5146
8273
00
84100
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Kedua perangkat mendapat skor keseluruhan yang sama
Core Ultra 3 205 unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core Ultra 3 205 menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Performa hampir sama
Harga sama
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core Ultra 3 205 dan Core Ultra 5 135UL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
51Lebih baik
46
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
43Lebih baik
40
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
41Lebih baik
37
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
84
100Lebih baik
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
58
58
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core Ultra 3 205 dan Core Ultra 5 135UL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Tanggal rilis20242023
Cache L1——
Cache L2——
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark26193—
PBP / MTP57 / 76 WLebih baik15 / 57 W
SoketLGA1851LGA1851
Cores / Threads4P+4E / 8Lebih baik2P+8E+2L / 14
ArsitekturArrow LakeMeteor Lake-PS
Kecepatan clockP 3,8 - 4,9 GHz / E 3,2 - 4,4 GHzLebih baikP 1,6 - 4,4 GHz / E 1,1 - 3,6 GHz / L 0,7 - 2,1 GHz
Clock dasar3800 MHzLebih baik1600 MHz
Boost clock4900 MHzLebih baik4400 MHz
Cache L315 MBLebih baik12 MB
Grafis terintegrasiArc Xe2 16 1,8 GHzArc Xe 64 1,95 GHzLebih baik
Konsumsi daya57 / 76 W15 / 57 WLebih baik
Node proses3 nmLebih baik7 nm
Dukungan memoriDDR5-6400DDR5-5600
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core Ultra 3 205 dan Core Ultra 5 135UL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100827312%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100554912%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core Ultra 3 205 dan Core Ultra 5 135UL dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100363212%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100403611%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100302711%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100413710%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10038358%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core Ultra 3 205 or Core Ultra 5 135UL?+
Core Ultra 3 205 has the higher overall gaming score, while Core Ultra 3 205 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core Ultra 3 205 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core Ultra 3 205 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core Ultra 3 205 offers more overall performance, while Core Ultra 3 205 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core Ultra 3 205 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core Ultra 3 205 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core Ultra 3 205 leads in combined 1440p performance. Core Ultra 3 205 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core Ultra 3 205 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core Ultra 3 205 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core Ultra 3 205 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core Ultra 3 205 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.