H2H

Intel Core Ultra 5 125ULVSIntel Core i3-13100F

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Catalog benchmarks3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL
♜ WINNERIntel Core Ultra 5 125UL+12%Better overall performance
Intel Core i3-13100F
IntelCore Ultra 5 125UL

Rp 0Average price

VS

Rp 2.133.205Average price

IntelCore i3-13100F
VS
WINNERCore Ultra 5 125UL11%Better overall performance
Performa4547
Efisiensi9966
Kepercayaan data3838

Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.

ANALISIS CEPAT

Intel Core Ultra 5 125UL vs Intel Core i3-13100F: kesimpulan utama

Perbandingan Core Ultra 5 125UL dan Core i3-13100F menunjukkan keunggulan 4% untuk Core i3-13100F pada «performa gaming», sementara Core Ultra 5 125UL bisa lebih baik pada «nilai untuk uang». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.

PROFIL RINGKAS

Radar metrik terverifikasi

Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.

Core Ultra 5 125ULIntel Core Ultra 5 125ULIntel
Core i3-13100FIntel Core i3-13100FIntel
H2H
Performa
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
Performa
4547
Single-core
7275
Cache L3
00
Efisiensi
9966
Nilai yang hilang tidak pernah diganti dengan nol atau rata-rata.Model: skala tetap H2H 2026.07.
HASIL PERBANDINGAN

Core Ultra 5 125UL adalah pilihan terbaik secara keseluruhan

Core Ultra 5 125UL unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core Ultra 5 125UL menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.

SELISIH PERFORMA12%

Core Ultra 5 125UL unggul pada indeks performa gabungan

SELISIH HARGARp 2.133.205

Core Ultra 5 125UL lebih murah

SKOR KESELURUHAN

Ringkasan

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core Ultra 5 125UL dan Core i3-13100F dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

CategoryCore Ultra 5 125ULCore i3-13100F
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
45
47Lebih baik
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
39
40Lebih baik
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
36
38Lebih baik
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
99Lebih baik
66
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
57Lebih baik
51
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP

Spesifikasi

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core Ultra 5 125UL dan Core i3-13100F dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

SpecificationCore Ultra 5 125ULCore i3-13100F
Tanggal rilis20232022
Cache L1
Cache L2
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark14658
PBP / MTP15 / 57 W58 / 89 WLebih baik
Cores / Threads2P+8E+2L / 144P / 8Lebih baik
SoketLGA1851Lebih baikLGA1700
ArsitekturMeteor Lake-PSRaptor Lake
Kecepatan clockP 1,3 - 4,3 GHz / E 0,8 - 3,6 GHz / L 0,7 - 2,1 GHzP 3,4 - 4,5 GHz /Lebih baik
Clock dasar1300 MHz3400 MHzLebih baik
Boost clock4300 MHz4500 MHzLebih baik
Cache L312 MB12 MB
Grafis terintegrasiArc Xe 64 1,85 GHz
Konsumsi daya15 / 57 WLebih baik58 / 89 W
Node proses7 nmLebih baik10 nm (Intel 7)
Dukungan memoriDDR5-5600DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload H2H

Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.

Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core Ultra 5 125UL dan Core i3-13100F dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksCore Ultra 5 125ULCore i3-13100FSelisih
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10072754%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10048504%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG

Indeks workload AI H2H

Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.

Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core Ultra 5 125UL dan Core i3-13100F dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.

IndeksCore Ultra 5 125ULCore i3-13100FSelisih
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10032333%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10035376%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10026274%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10036385%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10034353%

Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.

PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD

Jelaskan perbandingan ini

Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.

Device ACore Ultra 5 125UL57
Device BCore i3-13100F51
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI

Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.

KONFIGURASI NYATA

Pengalaman pemilik

Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.

Ditinjau moderatorBermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Pertanyaan umum perbandingan

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Core Ultra 5 125UL or Core i3-13100F?

Core Ultra 5 125UL has the higher overall gaming score, while Core Ultra 5 125UL offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Core Ultra 5 125UL is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Core Ultra 5 125UL is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Core Ultra 5 125UL offers more overall performance, while Core Ultra 5 125UL offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Core Ultra 5 125UL is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Core Ultra 5 125UL is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Core Ultra 5 125UL leads in combined 1440p performance. Core Ultra 5 125UL can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Core Ultra 5 125UL is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Core Ultra 5 125UL is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Core Ultra 5 125UL is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Core Ultra 5 125UL if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.