Intel Core Ultra 9 285VSAMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Core Ultra 9 285+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Core Ultra 9 285
VSWINNERCore Ultra 9 2850%Better overall performance
AMD
Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition
Performa5960
Efisiensi4237
Kepercayaan data3838
Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Core Ultra 9 285 dan Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition menunjukkan keunggulan 2% untuk Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition pada «performa gaming», sementara Core Ultra 9 285 bisa lebih baik pada «nilai untuk uang». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
IntelAMDPerforma
Single-core
Cache L3
Efisiensi
5960
9393
14
4237
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Kedua perangkat mendapat skor keseluruhan yang sama
Core Ultra 9 285 unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Core Ultra 9 285 menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Performa hampir sama
Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition lebih murah
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Core Ultra 9 285 dan Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
59
60Lebih baik
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
49
50Lebih baik
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
46
47Lebih baik
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
42Lebih baik
37
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
55
55
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Core Ultra 9 285 dan Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Tanggal rilis20242024
Cache L2——
Cache L1——
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark5757672474Lebih baik
ArsitekturArrow LakeGranite Ridge
PBP / MTP65 / 177 W200 WLebih baik
Grafis terintegrasiArc Xe2 64 2 GHzNavi II 2CU 2,2 GHz
Konsumsi daya65 / 177 WLebih baik200 W
Node proses3 nmLebih baik4 nm
Cores / Threads8P+16E / 2416 / 32Lebih baik
SoketLGA1851Lebih baikAM5
Kecepatan clockP 2,5 - 5,6 GHz / E 1,9 - 4,6 GHz4,3 - 5,6 GHzLebih baik
Clock dasar2500 MHz4300 MHzLebih baik
Boost clock5600 MHz5600 MHz
Cache L336 MB192 MBLebih baik
Dukungan memoriDDR5-6400DDR5-5600
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Core Ultra 9 285 dan Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10093930%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10062632%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10014120%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Core Ultra 9 285 dan Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10042432%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10046484%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10035363%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10044464%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core Ultra 9 285 or Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 Dual Edition?+
Core Ultra 9 285 has the higher overall gaming score, while Core Ultra 9 285 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core Ultra 9 285 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core Ultra 9 285 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core Ultra 9 285 offers more overall performance, while Core Ultra 9 285 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core Ultra 9 285 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core Ultra 9 285 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core Ultra 9 285 leads in combined 1440p performance. Core Ultra 9 285 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core Ultra 9 285 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core Ultra 9 285 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core Ultra 9 285 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core Ultra 9 285 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.