H2H

Ryzen 7 4700UVSRyzen 3 7320U

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Ryzen 7 4700U
♜ WINNERRyzen 7 4700U+22%Better overall performance
Ryzen 3 7320U
AMDRyzen 7 4700U

Rp 0Average price

VS

Rp 0Average price

AMDRyzen 3 7320U
VS
WINNERRyzen 7 4700U20%H2H overall index
Performa3932
Data confidence3838

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

Ryzen 7 4700URyzen 7 4700UAMD
Ryzen 3 7320URyzen 3 7320UAMD
H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
Performance
3932
Single-core
6868
Multi-core
2717
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Perangkat yang digunakan streamer

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Ryzen 7 4700UAMDRyzen 7 4700U0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
Ryzen 3 7320UAMDRyzen 3 7320U0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
HASIL PERBANDINGAN

Ryzen 7 4700U is the best overall choice

Ryzen 7 4700U leads in overall performance, while Ryzen 7 4700U offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE22%

Ryzen 7 4700U leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCERp 0

Prices are identical

SKOR KESELURUHAN

Ringkasan

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRyzen 7 4700URyzen 3 7320U
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39Better
32
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
29
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32Better
27
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
32Better
25
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
39Better
32
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP

Spesifikasi

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRyzen 7 4700URyzen 3 7320U
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 2
Base clock2 GHz2.4 GHzBetter
Boost clock4.1 GHz4.1 GHz
Integrated graphicsRadeon Vega 7Radeon 610MBetter
PassMark
Cores / threads8 / 8Better4 / 8
Clock speed
L3 cache
Socket
PBP / MTP
Power consumption
Process node
Release date
Memory support
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRyzen 7 4700URyzen 3 7320UDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100271745%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 100423518%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100271745%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRyzen 7 4700URyzen 3 7320UDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100393220%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100393220%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100393220%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100393220%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100393220%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARyzen 7 4700U39
Device BRyzen 3 7320U32
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Pengalaman pemilik

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

Pertanyaan umum perbandingan

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen 7 4700U or Ryzen 3 7320U?

Ryzen 7 4700U has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen 7 4700U offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Ryzen 7 4700U is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Ryzen 7 4700U is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Ryzen 7 4700U offers more overall performance, while Ryzen 7 4700U offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Ryzen 7 4700U is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Ryzen 7 4700U is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Ryzen 7 4700U leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen 7 4700U can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Ryzen 7 4700U is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Ryzen 7 4700U is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Ryzen 7 4700U is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Ryzen 7 4700U if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.