
AMD Ryzen 7 9700FVSApple M2 Ultra
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
AMD
Ryzen 7 9700F

VSWINNERRyzen 7 9700F11%Better overall performance
Apple
M2 Ultra

Performa5858
Efisiensi10066
Kepercayaan data3825
Model H2H skala tetap. Metrik yang hilang diabaikan, bukan diperkirakan dari skor keseluruhan.
AMD Ryzen 7 9700F vs Apple M2 Ultra: kesimpulan utama
Perbandingan Ryzen 7 9700F dan M2 Ultra menunjukkan keunggulan 0% untuk Ryzen 7 9700F pada «performa gaming», sementara M2 Ultra bisa lebih baik pada «efisiensi dan fitur». Bagian di bawah membantu melihat apakah selisih berasal dari FPS, spesifikasi, efisiensi, harga, atau platform.
PROFIL RINGKAS
Radar metrik terverifikasi
Sumbu tanpa data disembunyikan; setiap nilai memakai skala tetap.
AMD
ApplePerforma
Single-core
Efisiensi
5858
9258
10066
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Ryzen 7 9700F adalah pilihan terbaik secara keseluruhan
Ryzen 7 9700F unggul dalam performa keseluruhan, sementara Ryzen 7 9700F menawarkan harga/performa lebih baik. Periksa aplikasi Anda sebelum memilih.
Ryzen 7 9700F unggul pada indeks performa gabungan
Harga sama
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
Bagian «Skor ringkasan» membandingkan Ryzen 7 9700F dan M2 Ultra dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
GamePerforma DirectX, OpenCL, dan Vulkan
58
58
Aplikasi profesionalModeling 3D, editing video, dan rendering
48
48
AI dan machine learningKemampuan machine learning dan AI
46
46
Efisiensi dayaKonsumsi daya di berbagai beban
100Lebih baik
66
Skor Head to HeadSkor katalog keseluruhan
67Lebih baik
60
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Bagian «Spesifikasi» membandingkan Ryzen 7 9700F dan M2 Ultra dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
Tanggal rilis20242023-06-05
Cache L2——
Cache L1——
Device classDesktopDesktop
PassMark37006—
PBP / MTP65 W70 / 110 WLebih baik
Dukungan memoriDDR5-5600Unified memory, LPDDR5, up to 192 GB, 800 GB/s
Cores / Threads8 / 1624 / 24Lebih baik
SoketAM5—
ArsitekturGranite Ridge—
Kecepatan clock3,8 - 5,5 GHzLebih baikUp to 3.5 GHz
Clock dasar3800 MHz—
Boost clock5500 MHzLebih baik3.5 GHz
Cache L332 MB—
Konsumsi daya65 WLebih baik110 W
Node proses4 nm—
Grafis terintegrasi—Apple 60-core / 76-core GPU
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload H2H
Indeks internal sebanding pada skala tetap 0–100.
Bagian «Benchmark» membandingkan Ryzen 7 9700F dan M2 Ultra dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100925845%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10061585%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10010100%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
HEAD TO HEAD · INDEKS TERHITUNG
Indeks workload AI H2H
Profil estimasi berdasarkan data performa dan memori yang tersedia.
Bagian «Perbandingan detail» membandingkan Ryzen 7 9700F dan M2 Ultra dengan data H2H ternormalisasi, lalu mengubah spesifikasi, tes, dan nilai menjadi konteks pembelian praktis.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100415834%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100455825%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100345852%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100475821%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100445827%
Indeks H2H dari data katalog ternormalisasi; bukan hasil benchmark pihak ketiga.
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
Apa yang akan dijelaskan AI
Skor keseluruhan, radar, FPS, tes sintetis, spesifikasi, efisiensi, dan nilai.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Ditinjau moderator☆Bermanfaat bagi komunitas🏅Lencana ahli
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen 7 9700F or M2 Ultra?+
Ryzen 7 9700F has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen 7 9700F offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Ryzen 7 9700F is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Ryzen 7 9700F is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Ryzen 7 9700F offers more overall performance, while Ryzen 7 9700F offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Ryzen 7 9700F is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Ryzen 7 9700F is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Ryzen 7 9700F leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen 7 9700F can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Ryzen 7 9700F is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Ryzen 7 9700F is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Ryzen 7 9700F is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Ryzen 7 9700F if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.
