Intel Arc A310VSATI Radeon HD 2350
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Arc A310+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Arc A310
VSWINNERArc A3100%H2H overall index
AMD
ATI Radeon HD 2350
Performa3938
Efisiensi100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3938
100100
100100
607
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelArc A3100No verified public setup yet
AMDATI Radeon HD 23500No verified public setup yet
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
The devices received the same overall score
Arc A310 leads in combined gaming performance. Arc A310 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
ATI Radeon HD 2350 costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 85–90of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Intel Arc A310
0 sukaHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
ATI Radeon HD 2350
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
39Better
38
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
31
100Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
32Better
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
62
62
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Thickness——
Clock speed1750 - 2000 MHzBetter525 MHz
Base clock1750 MHzBetter525 MHz
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter525 MHz
VRAM4 GB GDDR6256 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR6BetterDDR2
VRAM capacity4 GB256 MBBetter
Frekuensi memori15,5 GHz800 MHzBetter
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
Memory bandwidth124 GB/s6400 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 4x8BetterPCIe 1x16
Power connector--
Power consumption75 W20 WBetter
TDP75 W20 WBetter
Process node6 nmBetter65 nm
Release date2022Better2007
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS2.688Better0.048
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS game
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10039383%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100463042%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100452943%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100607158%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100492468%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100482659%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100452943%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100512183%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100452943%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node6 nmBetter65 nm
Release date2022Better2007
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1750 MHzBetter525 MHz
Boost clock2000 MHzBetter525 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x8BetterPCIe 1x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector--
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM4 GB GDDR6256 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeGDDR6BetterDDR2
Memory bus64 bit64 bit
Memory bandwidth124 GB/s6400 GB/sBetter
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Arc A310 or ATI Radeon HD 2350?+
Arc A310 has the higher overall gaming score, while Arc A310 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Arc A310 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Arc A310 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Arc A310 offers more overall performance, while ATI Radeon HD 2350 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Arc A310 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Arc A310 leads in combined 1440p performance. ATI Radeon HD 2350 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Arc A310 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
ATI Radeon HD 2350 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Arc A310 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.