GeForce GTX 1660 TiVSIntel Arc A310
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce GTX 1660 Ti+2%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1660 Ti
VSWINNERGTX 1660 Ti2%H2H overall index
Intel
Arc A310
Performa4039
Efisiensi100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAIntelPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
4039
100100
100100
6060
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIAGTX 1660 Ti0No verified public setup yet
IntelArc A3100No verified public setup yet
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
GTX 1660 Ti is the best overall choice
GTX 1660 Ti leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1660 Ti offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
GTX 1660 Ti leads in the combined performance index
GTX 1660 Ti costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 75–80of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
0 sukaHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Intel Arc A310
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
40Better
39
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
34Better
31
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
33Better
32
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63Better
62
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed1500 - 1770 MHz1750 - 2000 MHzBetter
Base clock1500 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock1770 MHz2000 MHzBetter
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
VRAM capacity6 GBBetter4 GB
Frekuensi memori12 GHz15,5 GHzBetter
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth288 GB/sBetter124 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x8Better
Power connector8 pin-
Power consumption120 W75 WBetter
TDP120 W75 WBetter
Process node12 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20192022Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS5.437Better2.688
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS game
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10040393%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10046460%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10046452%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10060600%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10048480%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10046452%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10051510%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10046452%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node12 nm6 nmBetter
Release date20192022Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1500 MHz1750 MHzBetter
Boost clock1770 MHz2000 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4x8Better
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8 pin-
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM6 GB GDDR6Better4 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth288 GB/sBetter124 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
740M 8300GAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1660 Ti or Arc A310?+
GTX 1660 Ti has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1660 Ti offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1660 Ti is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1660 Ti is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1660 Ti offers more overall performance, while GTX 1660 Ti offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1660 Ti is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1660 Ti is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1660 Ti leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1660 Ti can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1660 Ti is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Arc A310 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Arc A310 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1660 Ti if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.