GeForce GTX 1060 3GBVSGeForce GTX 1630
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce GTX 1060 3GB+1%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1060 3GB
VSWINNERGTX 1060 3GB0%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
GTX 1630
Performa3636
Efisiensi100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIANVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3636
100100
100100
5660
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIAGTX 1060 3GB0No verified public setup yet
NVIDIAGTX 16300No verified public setup yet
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
The devices received the same overall score
GTX 1060 3GB leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1060 3GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
GTX 1060 3GB costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 110–115of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
0 sukaHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1630
100/100 · Price $119The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
36
36
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
28
29Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
30
30
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
60
60
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6Better
Clock speed1506 - 1708 MHz1740 - 1785 MHzBetter
Base clock1506 MHz1740 MHzBetter
Boost clock1708 MHz1785 MHzBetter
VRAM3 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR6Better
VRAM capacity3 GB4 GBBetter
Frekuensi memori8 GHz12 GHzBetter
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sBetter96 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x8
Power connector6 pin-
Power consumption120 W75 WBetter
TDP120 W75 WBetter
Process node16 nm12 nmBetter
Release date20162022Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS3.935Better1.828
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS game
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10036360%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10042432%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10042432%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10056607%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10045474%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10044464%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10042432%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10047494%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10042432%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node16 nm12 nmBetter
Release date20162022Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock1506 MHz1740 MHzBetter
Boost clock1708 MHz1785 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x8
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector6 pin-
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM3 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR6Better
Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6Better
Memory bus192 bitBetter64 bit
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sBetter96 GB/s
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
740M 8300GAMDReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1060 3GB or GTX 1630?+
GTX 1060 3GB has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1060 3GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1060 3GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1060 3GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1060 3GB offers more overall performance, while GTX 1630 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1060 3GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1060 3GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1060 3GB leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1630 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1060 3GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1630 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1630 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1060 3GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.