Radeon RX 6550MVSGeForce GTX 1660
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6550M+3%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 6550M
VSWINNERRadeon RX 6550M3%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
GTX 1660
Performa5035
Efisiensi10097
Data confidence4560
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
5035
10097
KOMUNITAS · DATA TERVERIFIKASI
Buka setup streamer→Hardware yang digunakan streamer
Setup publik nyata yang terkait dengan setiap perangkat.
AMDRadeon RX 6550M0Belum ada setup publik terverifikasi
NVIDIAGTX 16600Belum ada setup publik terverifikasi
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
Radeon RX 6550M is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 6550M leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1660 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 6550M leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 6550M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 83–88of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6550M
0 sukaHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1660
100/100 · Price $229The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
50Better
35
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
42Better
32
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
40Better
29
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
97
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61Better
59
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS5.816Better5.027
TDP80 WBetter120 W
ArchitectureRDNA 2Turing
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Launch price—$229
Shader units / Cores10241408Better
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3x16
Power connectorNone8 pin
Release date2023-01-042019
Recommended PSU—300 W
Length—229 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Die size107 mm²Better284 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 1 MBL1 64 KB, L2 1.5 MB
Clock speed2000–2840 MHzBetter1530 - 1785 MHz
Base clock2000 MHzBetter1530 MHz
Boost clock2840 MHzBetter1785 MHz
Video memory4 GB GDDR66 GB GDDR5Better
Memory clock2250 MHzBetter8 GHz
Memory bus64 bit192 bitBetter
Bandwidth144 GB/s192 GB/sBetter
Power consumption80 WBetter120 W
Process node6 nmBetter12 nm
Transistor count5400 million6600 millionBetter
FPS game
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100503535%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100583939%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100503535%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100100973%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100503535%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100503535%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100503535%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100503535%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100503535%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.1
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 2Turing
Process node6 nmBetter12 nm
Release date2023-01-042019
Detailed specifications
Transistor count5400 million6600 millionBetter
Die size107 mm²Better284 mm²
Shader units / Cores10241408Better
Base clock2000 MHzBetter1530 MHz
Boost clock2840 MHzBetter1785 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4PCIe 3x16
Length—229 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSU—300 W
Power connectorNone8 pin
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory4 GB GDDR66 GB GDDR5Better
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Memory bus64 bit192 bitBetter
TFLOPS5.816Better5.027
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
PENJELASAN AI · HEAD TO HEAD
Jelaskan perbandingan ini
Lebih dari persentase: penyebab, spesifikasi relevan, dan dampak praktis di balik setiap grafik.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
KONFIGURASI NYATA
Pengalaman pemilik
Rakitan nyata, hasil, dan masukan komunitas.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6550M or GTX 1660?+
Radeon RX 6550M has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1660 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1660 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1660 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6550M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 6550M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1660 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1660 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6550M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 6550M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 6550M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6550M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6550M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6550M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.