Radeon RX 7600SVSRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7600S+1%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 7600S
VSWINNERRadeon RX 7600S0%H2H overall index
AMD
Vega Frontier Edition
Performa4748
Efisiensi10053
Data confidence6075
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4748
10053
6888
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Perangkat yang digunakan streamer
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRadeon RX 7600S0No verified public setup yet
AMDVega Frontier Edition0No verified public setup yet
HASIL PERBANDINGAN
The devices received the same overall score
Radeon RX 7600S leads in combined gaming performance. Vega Frontier Edition offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 7600S costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 134–139of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7600S
0 sukaHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
100/100 · Price $419The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
SKOR KESELURUHAN
Ringkasan
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
47
48Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40
47Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
44
45Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
53
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
59
59
PERBANDINGAN LENGKAP
Spesifikasi
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
ArchitectureRDNA 3GCN 5.0Better
Memory typeGDDR6BetterHBM2
Тип GPUDiscreteДискретный
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX12.2Better12.1
Vulkan1.4Better1.3
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2BetterOpenCL 2.1
TFLOPS15.77Better13.11
Launch price—$419
Transistor count13300 millionBetter12500 million
Die size204 mm²495 mm²Better
Shader units / cores17924096Better
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 16 KB, L2 4 MB
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16BetterPCIe 3x16
Clock speed1500–2200 MHzBetter1440 - 1600 MHz
Base clock1500 MHzBetter1440 MHz
Boost clock2200 MHzBetter1600 MHz
VRAM8 GB GDDR616 GB HBM2Better
VRAM capacity8 GB16 GBBetter
Frekuensi memori2000 MHzBetter1,89 GHz
Memory bus128 bit2048 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s484 GB/sBetter
Power connectorNone8+8 pin
Power consumption75 WBetter300 W
TDP75 WBetter300 W
Process node6 nmBetter14 nm
Release date2023-01-04Better2017
Recommended PSU—700 W
Length—267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
FPS game
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10047482%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10054552%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100535911%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100688826%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001005361%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100576615%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100566413%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100535911%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100597017%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100536012%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 3GCN 5.0Better
Process node6 nmBetter14 nm
Release date2023-01-04Better2017
Launch price—$419
Detailed specifications
Transistor count13300 millionBetter12500 million
Die size204 mm²495 mm²Better
Shader units / cores17924096Better
Base clock1500 MHzBetter1440 MHz
Boost clock2200 MHzBetter1600 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16BetterPCIe 3x16
Length—267 mm
ThicknessIGPDual-slot
Recommended PSU—700 W
Power connectorNone8+8 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM8 GB GDDR616 GB HBM2Better
Memory typeGDDR6BetterHBM2
Memory bus128 bit2048 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s484 GB/sBetter
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 16 KB, L2 4 MB
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.2Better12.1
Vulkan1.4Better1.3
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2BetterOpenCL 2.1
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Pengalaman pemilik
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Pertanyaan umum perbandingan
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7600S or Vega Frontier Edition?+
Radeon RX 7600S has the higher overall gaming score, while Vega Frontier Edition offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 7600S is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 7600S is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7600S offers more overall performance, while Vega Frontier Edition offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Vega Frontier Edition is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Vega Frontier Edition is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7600S leads in combined 1440p performance. Vega Frontier Edition can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Vega Frontier Edition is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7600S is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7600S is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7600S if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.