Intel Core 7 251EVSIntel Core i9-13900
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERIntel Core 7 251E+1%Better overall performance
Intel
Core 7 251E
VSWINNERCore 7 251E0%H2H overall index
Intel
Core i9-13900
Prestazioni7070
Efficienza4040
Data confidence6262
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
IntelIntelPerformance
Single-core
Multi-core
L3 cache
Efficiency
7070
9393
7878
11
4040
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
IntelCore 7 251E0No verified public setup yet
IntelCore i9-139000No verified public setup yet
RISULTATO DEL CONFRONTO
The devices received the same overall score
Core 7 251E leads in overall performance, while Core 7 251E offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.
Performance is nearly identical
Core 7 251E costs less
PUNTEGGIO COMPLESSIVO
Panoramica
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
70
70
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
57
57
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
54
54
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
40
40
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
63
63
CONFRONTO COMPLETO
Specifiche
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
PassMark3419650088Better
Core / thread8P+16E / 328P+16E / 32
Clock speedP 2,1 - 5,6 GHz / E 1,6 - 4,4 GHzBetterP 2 - 5,6 GHz / E 1,5 - 4,2 GHz
Base clock2100 MHzBetter2000 MHz
Boost clock5600 MHz5600 MHz
Кэш26+36 MB32+36 MBBetter
Кэш L336 MB36 MB
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Встроенная графикаUHD 770 1,65 GHzUHD 770 1,65 GHz
PBP / MTP65 / 219 W65 / 219 W
Power consumption65 / 219 W65 / 219 W
Поддержка памятиDDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200DDR5-5600 / DDR4-3200
Process node10 nm (Intel 7)10 nm (Intel 7)
ArchitectureBartlett LakeRaptor Lake
Кодовое имяBartlett LakeRaptor Lake
Release date——
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10093930%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10078780%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10071710%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10063630%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10049490%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10055550%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10041410%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10056560%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10053530%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Domande frequenti sul confronto
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Core 7 251E or Core i9-13900?+
Core 7 251E has the higher overall gaming score, while Core 7 251E offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Core 7 251E is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Core 7 251E is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Core 7 251E offers more overall performance, while Core 7 251E offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Core 7 251E is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Core 7 251E is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Core 7 251E leads in combined 1440p performance. Core 7 251E can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Core 7 251E is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Core 7 251E is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Core 7 251E is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Core 7 251E if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.