Radeon RX 7900MVSGeForce RTX 4080
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce RTX 4080+9%Better gaming performance
AMD
Radeon RX 7900M
VSWINNERRTX 40809%Better gaming performance
NVIDIA
RTX 4080
Prestazioni6672
Efficienza10075
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDNVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
6672
10075
8888
COMMUNITY · DATI VERIFICATI
Apri setup degli streamer→Hardware usato dagli streamer
Configurazioni pubbliche reali collegate a ogni dispositivo.
AMDRadeon RX 7900M0Nessun setup pubblico verificato ancora
NVIDIARTX 40800Nessun setup pubblico verificato ancora
RISULTATO DEL CONFRONTO
Radeon RX 7900M is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 7900M leads in combined gaming performance. RTX 4080 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 7900M leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 7900M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 13–18of 81
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7900M
0 Mi piaceHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce RTX 4080
74/100 · Price $1199The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
PUNTEGGIO COMPLESSIVO
Panoramica
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
66
72Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
54
58Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
52
56Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
75
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
74Better
73
CONFRONTO COMPLETO
Specifiche
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS38.5248.74Better
TDP180 WBetter320 W
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ada Lovelace
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
Launch price—$1199
Shader units / Cores46089728Better
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Power connectorNone16 pin
Release date2023-10-192022
Recommended PSU—700 W
Length—310 mm
ThicknessIGPTriple-slot
Die size529 mm²379 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 250 KB, L2 6 MBL1 128 KB, L2 64 MB
Clock speed1825–2090 MHz2205 - 2505 MHzBetter
Base clock1825 MHz2205 MHzBetter
Boost clock2090 MHz2505 MHzBetter
Video memory16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6X
Memory clock2250 MHzBetter22,4 GHz
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
Bandwidth576 GB/s717 GB/sBetter
Power consumption180 WBetter320 W
Process node5 nm5 nm
Transistor count57700 millionBetter45900 million
FPS nei giochi
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10066729%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10070768%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10072765%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10088880%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001007529%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10076794%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10075784%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10072765%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10078814%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10073775%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 3.0, CUDA 8.9
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 3Ada Lovelace
Process node5 nm5 nm
Release date2023-10-192022
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count57700 millionBetter45900 million
Die size529 mm²379 mm²Better
Shader units / Cores46089728Better
Base clock1825 MHz2205 MHzBetter
Boost clock2090 MHz2505 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4x16
Length—310 mm
ThicknessIGPTriple-slot
Recommended PSU—700 W
Power connectorNone16 pin
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
DisplayPort—1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6X
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6X
Memory bus256 bit256 bit
TFLOPS38.5248.74Better
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
Reviews and questions
SPIEGAZIONE IA · HEAD TO HEAD
Spiega questo confronto
Oltre le percentuali: cause, specifiche rilevanti e impatto pratico dietro ogni grafico.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
CONFIGURAZIONI REALI
Esperienze dei proprietari
Build reali, risultati e feedback della community.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Domande frequenti sul confronto
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7900M or RTX 4080?+
Radeon RX 7900M has the higher overall gaming score, while RTX 4080 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RTX 4080 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RTX 4080 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7900M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7900M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RTX 4080 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RTX 4080 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7900M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7900M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7900M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7900M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7900M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7900M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.