Radeon RX 470 8GBVSRadeon RX Vega 56
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 470 8GB+1%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 470 8GB
VSWINNERRX 470 8GB0%H2H overall index
AMD
RX Vega 56
Prestazioni3341
Efficienza9265
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3341
9265
100100
6868
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
AMDRX 470 8GB0No verified public setup yet
AMDRX Vega 560No verified public setup yet
RISULTATO DEL CONFRONTO
The devices received the same overall score
RX 470 8GB leads in combined gaming performance. RX 470 8GB offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
RX 470 8GB costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 132–137of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 470 8GB
0 Mi piaceHead to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 470 8GB
100/100 · Price $239The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
PUNTEGGIO COMPLESSIVO
Panoramica
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
33
41Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
30
36Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
28
34Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
92Better
65
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
57
57
CONFRONTO COMPLETO
Specifiche
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed926 - 1206 MHz1156 - 1471 MHzBetter
Base clock926 MHz1156 MHzBetter
Boost clock1206 MHz1471 MHzBetter
VRAM8 GB GDDR58 GB HBM2
Memory typeGDDR5BetterHBM2
VRAM capacity8 GB8 GB
Frequenza della memoria6,6 GHzBetter1,6 GHz
Memory bus256 bit2048 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth211 GB/s410 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Power connector8 pin8+8 pin
Power consumption120 WBetter210 W
TDP120 WBetter210 W
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20162017Better
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS4.9410.54Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
FPS nei giochi
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100334122%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100394616%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100434913%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100926534%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10049538%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100475210%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100434913%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10052567%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100444911%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
Basic information
Architecture——
Process node14 nm14 nm
Release date20162017Better
Launch price——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock926 MHz1156 MHzBetter
Boost clock1206 MHz1471 MHzBetter
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 3x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8 pin8+8 pin
VRAM capacity and type
VRAM8 GB GDDR58 GB HBM2
Memory typeGDDR5BetterHBM2
Memory bus256 bit2048 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth211 GB/s410 GB/sBetter
Memory cache——
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6Other comparisons
205NVIDIAReviews and questions
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
Domande frequenti sul confronto
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 470 8GB or RX Vega 56?+
RX 470 8GB has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 470 8GB offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 470 8GB is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 470 8GB is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 470 8GB offers more overall performance, while RX 470 8GB offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 470 8GB is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 470 8GB is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 470 8GB leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 470 8GB can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 470 8GB is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 470 8GB is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 470 8GB is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 470 8GB if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.