H2H

Ryzen 5 7535HSVSAMD EPYC 4565P

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Ryzen 5 7535HS
♜ WINNERRyzen 5 7535HS+1%Better overall performance
AMD EPYC 4565P
AMDRyzen 5 7535HS

₩0Average price

VS

₩0Average price

AMDEPYC 4565P
VS
WINNERRyzen 5 7535HS1%H2H overall index
성능7680
Data confidence2562

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

Ryzen 5 7535HSRyzen 5 7535HSAMD
EPYC 4565PAMD EPYC 4565PAMD
H2H
Performance
Single-core
Performance
7680
Single-core
7695
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Ryzen 5 7535HSAMDRyzen 5 7535HS0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
AMD EPYC 4565PAMDEPYC 4565P0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
비교 결과

Ryzen 5 7535HS is the best overall choice

Ryzen 5 7535HS leads in overall performance, while Ryzen 5 7535HS offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE1%

Ryzen 5 7535HS leads in the combined performance index

PRICE DIFFERENCE₩0

Prices are identical

종합 점수

개요

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRyzen 5 7535HSEPYC 4565P
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
76
80Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
61
64Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
59
62Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
69Better
59
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
76Better
75
전체 비교

사양

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRyzen 5 7535HSEPYC 4565P
СерияRyzen 7035
ArchitectureZen 3+Grado
Кодовое имяRembrandt-RGrado
Год выпуска2023
Ядра6
Потоки12
Base clock3.3 GHz4300 MHzBetter
Boost clock4.55 GHz5700 MHzBetter
Встроенная графикаRadeon 660MBetterNavi II 2CU 2,2 GHz
Форм-факторMobile
PBP / MTP170 W
Process node4 nm
PassMark64443
코어 / 스레드16 / 32
Clock speed4,3 - 5,7 GHz
Кэш16+64 MB
Кэш L364 MB
소켓AM5
Power consumption170 W
Поддержка памятиDDR5-5600
Release date
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRyzen 5 7535HSEPYC 4565PDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 100769522%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 100093200%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10076805%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100074200%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRyzen 5 7535HSEPYC 4565PDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 100765630%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 100766319%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 100764747%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 100766417%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 100766024%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARyzen 5 7535HS76
Device BEPYC 4565P75
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

비교 자주 묻는 질문

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen 5 7535HS or EPYC 4565P?

Ryzen 5 7535HS has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen 5 7535HS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Ryzen 5 7535HS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Ryzen 5 7535HS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Ryzen 5 7535HS offers more overall performance, while Ryzen 5 7535HS offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Ryzen 5 7535HS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Ryzen 5 7535HS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Ryzen 5 7535HS leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen 5 7535HS can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Ryzen 5 7535HS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

EPYC 4565P is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

EPYC 4565P is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Ryzen 5 7535HS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.