H2H

Ryzen 5 7640UVSRyzen 5 8640U

Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison

🎮 Tested in 0 games3 resolutions: 1080p / 1440p / 4KCurrent catalog dataTesting methodology
Ryzen 5 7640U
♜ WINNERRyzen 5 7640U+1%Better overall performance
Ryzen 5 8640U
AMDRyzen 5 7640U

₩0Average price

VS

₩0Average price

AMDRyzen 5 8640U
VS
WINNERRyzen 5 7640U0%H2H overall index
성능4545
Data confidence3838

Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.

SUMMARY PROFILE

Verified-metrics radar

Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.

Ryzen 5 7640URyzen 5 7640UAMD
Ryzen 5 8640URyzen 5 8640UAMD
H2H
Performance
Single-core
Multi-core
Performance
4545
Single-core
8282
Multi-core
3030
Missing values are never replaced with zero or an average.Model: H2H 2026.07 fixed scale.
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA

Hardware used by streamers

Real public setups linked to each device.

Open streamer setups
Ryzen 5 7640UAMDRyzen 5 7640U0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
VS
Ryzen 5 8640UAMDRyzen 5 8640U0

No verified public setup yet

0verified setups
비교 결과

The devices received the same overall score

Ryzen 5 7640U leads in overall performance, while Ryzen 5 7640U offers better price-to-performance. Check results in your applications before making the final choice.

PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCE0%

Performance is nearly identical

PRICE DIFFERENCE₩0

Prices are identical

종합 점수

개요

Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.

CategoryRyzen 5 7640URyzen 5 8640U
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
45
45
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
39
39
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
36
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
38
38
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
45
45
전체 비교

사양

The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.

SpecificationRyzen 5 7640URyzen 5 8640U
СерияRyzen 7040Ryzen 8040Better
ArchitectureZen 4Zen 4
Кодовое имяPhoenixHawk Point
Год выпуска20232024Better
Ядра66
Потоки1212
Base clock3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock4.9 GHz4.9 GHz
Встроенная графикаRadeon 760MRadeon 760M
Форм-факторMobileMobile
PassMark
코어 / 스레드6 / 126 / 12
Clock speed
Кэш
Кэш L3
소켓
PBP / MTP
Power consumption
Поддержка памяти
Process node
Release date
Сокет / корпус
Сегмент
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H workload indices

Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.

IndexRyzen 5 7640URyzen 5 8640UDifference
H2H Single-core IndexH2H Index / 10082820%
H2H Multi-core IndexH2H Index / 10030300%
H2H Productivity IndexH2H Index / 10048480%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10030300%
H2H Value IndexH2H Index / 100000%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX

H2H AI workload indices

Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.

IndexRyzen 5 7640URyzen 5 8640UDifference
H2H ML Preprocessing IndexH2H Index / 10045450%
H2H CPU Inference IndexH2H Index / 10045450%
H2H Local LLM CPU IndexH2H Index / 10045450%
H2H Data Pipeline IndexH2H Index / 10045450%
H2H Computer Vision CPU IndexH2H Index / 10045450%

These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.

AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD

Explain this comparison

Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.

Device ARyzen 5 7640U45
Device BRyzen 5 8640U45
What AI will explain

Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.

REAL CONFIGURATIONS

Owner experiences

Real builds, results, and community feedback.

Moderator reviewedHelpful to the community🏅Expert badges
FAQ · CHOOSE BY USE CASE

비교 자주 묻는 질문

Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.

01Which is better for gaming: Ryzen 5 7640U or Ryzen 5 8640U?

Ryzen 5 7640U has the higher overall gaming score, while Ryzen 5 7640U offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.

02Which is better for streaming?

Ryzen 5 7640U is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.

03Which is better for Blender?

Ryzen 5 7640U is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.

04Which is better for video editing?

Ryzen 5 7640U offers more overall performance, while Ryzen 5 7640U offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.

05Which is better for neural networks and AI?

Ryzen 5 7640U is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.

06Which is better for 1080p?

Ryzen 5 7640U is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.

07Which is better for 1440p?

Ryzen 5 7640U leads in combined 1440p performance. Ryzen 5 7640U can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.

08Which is better for 4K?

Ryzen 5 7640U is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.

09Which is better for a quiet PC?

Ryzen 5 7640U is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.

10Which is better without replacing the power supply?

Ryzen 5 7640U is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.

11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?

Consider upgrading to Ryzen 5 7640U if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.