GeForce 8300 GSVSGeForce 8500 GT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce 8300 GS+1%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
8300 GS
VSWINNER8300 GS0%H2H overall index
NVIDIA
8500 GT
성능3737
효율성100100
Price / Performance100100
Data confidence7575
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIANVIDIAPerformance
Efficiency
Price / performance
Memory capacity
3737
100100
100100
47
COMMUNITY · VERIFIED DATA
Open streamer setups→Hardware used by streamers
Real public setups linked to each device.
NVIDIA8300 GS0No verified public setup yet
NVIDIA8500 GT0No verified public setup yet
비교 결과
The devices received the same overall score
8300 GS leads in combined gaming performance. 8300 GS offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Prices are identical
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 95–100of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce 8300 GS
0 좋아요Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce 8300 GS
100/100 · Price $79The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
종합 점수
개요
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
37
37
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
100
100
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
31
31
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
61
61
전체 비교
사양
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
Clock speed459 MHz459 MHz
Base clock459 MHz459 MHz
Boost clock459 MHz459 MHz
VRAM128 MB DDR2256 MB DDR2Better
Memory typeDDR2DDR2
VRAM capacity128 MB256 MBBetter
메모리 클럭800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bus64 bit128 bitBetter
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/s12800 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 2x16BetterPCIe 1x16
Power connector--
Power consumption40 W30 WBetter
TDP40 W30 WBetter
Process node80 nm80 nm
Release date20072007
Architecture——
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness——
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
TFLOPS0.0150.029Better
Launch price——
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Memory cache——
게임 FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10037370%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10029290%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10028294%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 1004755%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10022234%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10024254%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10028294%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10019205%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10027284%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
기본 정보
Architecture——
Process node80 nm80 nm
Release date20072007
Launch price——
상세 사양
Transistor count——
Die size——
Shader units / cores——
Base clock459 MHz459 MHz
Boost clock459 MHz459 MHz
폼 팩터 및 호환성
InterfacePCIe 2x16우수PCIe 1x16
Length——
Thickness——
Recommended PSU——
Power connector--
VRAM 용량 및 유형
VRAM128 MB DDR2256 MB DDR2우수
Memory typeDDR2DDR2
Memory bus64 bit128 bit우수
Memory bandwidth6400 GB/s12800 GB/s우수
Memory cache——
연결 및 출력
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Maximum displays——
Maximum resolution——
API 및 SDK 호환성
DirectX——
Vulkan——
OpenGL——
Upscaling——
Compute API——
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6다른 비교
740M 8300GAMD리뷰 및 질문
AI EXPLAIN · HEAD TO HEAD
Explain this comparison
Beyond percentages: causes, relevant specifications, and practical impact behind every chart.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
REAL CONFIGURATIONS
Owner experiences
Real builds, results, and community feedback.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
비교 자주 묻는 질문
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: 8300 GS or 8500 GT?+
8300 GS has the higher overall gaming score, while 8300 GS offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
8300 GS is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
8300 GS is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
8300 GS offers more overall performance, while 8500 GT offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
8300 GS is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
8300 GS is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
8300 GS leads in combined 1440p performance. 8500 GT can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
8300 GS is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
8500 GT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
8500 GT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to 8300 GS if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.