GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6VSRadeon RX 6600M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERGeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6+1%Better overall performance
NVIDIA
GTX 1650 GDDR6
VSWINNERGTX 1650 GDDR60%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6600M
성능3246
효율성100100
Data confidence6045
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
NVIDIAAMDPerformance
Efficiency
3246
100100
커뮤니티 · 검증된 데이터
스트리머 구성 열기→스트리머가 사용하는 하드웨어
각 기기와 연결된 실제 공개 구성입니다.
NVIDIAGTX 1650 GDDR60아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
AMDRadeon RX 6600M0아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
비교 결과
The devices received the same overall score
GTX 1650 GDDR6 leads in combined gaming performance. GTX 1650 GDDR6 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Performance is nearly identical
Radeon RX 6600M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 109–114of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
0 좋아요Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
100/100 · Price $169The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
종합 점수
개요
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
32
46Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
29
40Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
27
37Better
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58
58
전체 비교
사양
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS2.8498.659Better
TDP75 WBetter100 W
Clock speed1410 - 1590 MHz2068–2416 MHzBetter
Base clock1410 MHz2068 MHzBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connectorNoneNone
Boost clock1590 MHz2416 MHzBetter
Video memory4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6Better
Memory clock12 GHz1750 MHzBetter
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Bandwidth192 GB/s224 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Power consumption75 WBetter100 W
Release date20202021-05-31
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$169—
Process node12 nm7 nmBetter
Recommended PSU250 W—
Length229 mm—
Transistor count4700 million11060 millionBetter
Shader units / Cores8961792Better
Die size200 mm²Better237 mm²
Memory cacheL1 64 KB, L2 1 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
게임 FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100324636%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 100365236%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100324636%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100324636%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100324636%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100324636%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100324636%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100324636%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.112.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 3.0, CUDA 7.5OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureTuringRDNA 2
Process node12 nm7 nm우수
Release date20202021-05-31
Detailed specifications
Transistor count4700 million11060 million우수
Die size200 mm²우수237 mm²
Shader units / Cores8961792우수
Base clock1410 MHz2068 MHz우수
Boost clock1590 MHz2416 MHz우수
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 3x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mm—
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU250 W—
Power connectorNoneNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a—
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory4 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6우수
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS2.8498.659우수
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6다른 비교
리뷰 및 질문
AI 설명 · HEAD TO HEAD
이 비교 설명하기
퍼센트 이상의 설명: 각 차트의 원인, 관련 사양, 실제 영향을 분석합니다.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
실제 구성
소유자 경험
실제 빌드, 결과 및 커뮤니티 피드백.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
비교 자주 묻는 질문
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: GTX 1650 GDDR6 or Radeon RX 6600M?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 has the higher overall gaming score, while GTX 1650 GDDR6 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 offers more overall performance, while GTX 1650 GDDR6 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 leads in combined 1440p performance. GTX 1650 GDDR6 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
GTX 1650 GDDR6 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to GTX 1650 GDDR6 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.