Radeon RX 6600MVSIntel Arc A730M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 6600M+2%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 6600M
VSWINNERRadeon RX 6600M2%H2H overall index
Intel
Intel Arc A730M
성능4644
효율성100100
Data confidence4545
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDIntelPerformance
Efficiency
4644
100100
커뮤니티 · 검증된 데이터
스트리머 구성 열기→스트리머가 사용하는 하드웨어
각 기기와 연결된 실제 공개 구성입니다.
AMDRadeon RX 6600M0아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
IntelIntel Arc A730M0아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
비교 결과
Radeon RX 6600M is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 6600M leads in combined gaming performance. Radeon RX 6600M offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 6600M leads in the combined performance index
Prices are identical
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 110–115of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 6600M
0 좋아요Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 6600M
0/100 · Price $0The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
종합 점수
개요
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46Better
44
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
38
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37Better
36
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
57
전체 비교
사양
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS8.65912.6Better
TDP100 W80 WBetter
ArchitectureRDNA 2Xe HPG (Alchemist)
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0
Launch price——
Shader units / Cores17923072Better
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Power connectorNone—
Release date2021-05-312022-01-01
Recommended PSU——
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Die size237 mm²Better406 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL2 12 MBBetter
Clock speed2068–2416 MHzBetter1100–2050 MHz
Base clock2068 MHzBetter1100 MHz
Boost clock2416 MHzBetter2050 MHz
Video memory8 GB GDDR612 GB GDDR6Better
Memory clock1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bus128 bit192 bitBetter
Bandwidth224 GB/s336 GB/sBetter
Power consumption100 W80 WBetter
Process node7 nm6 nmBetter
Transistor count11060 million21700 millionBetter
게임 FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10052488%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100000%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10046444%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.1OpenCL 3.0
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 2Xe HPG (Alchemist)
Process node7 nm6 nm우수
Release date2021-05-312022-01-01
Detailed specifications
Transistor count11060 million21700 million우수
Die size237 mm²우수406 mm²
Shader units / Cores17923072우수
Base clock2068 MHz우수1100 MHz
Boost clock2416 MHz우수2050 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Recommended PSU——
Power connectorNone—
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory8 GB GDDR612 GB GDDR6우수
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit192 bit우수
TFLOPS8.65912.6우수
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6다른 비교
205NVIDIA리뷰 및 질문
AI 설명 · HEAD TO HEAD
이 비교 설명하기
퍼센트 이상의 설명: 각 차트의 원인, 관련 사양, 실제 영향을 분석합니다.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
실제 구성
소유자 경험
실제 빌드, 결과 및 커뮤니티 피드백.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
비교 자주 묻는 질문
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 6600M or Intel Arc A730M?+
Radeon RX 6600M has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon RX 6600M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 6600M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 6600M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 6600M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 6600M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 6600M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon RX 6600M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 6600M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 6600M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 6600M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Intel Arc A730M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Intel Arc A730M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 6600M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.