Radeon RX 7900 GREVSRadeon RX 6850M XT
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7900 GRE+1%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 7900 GRE
VSWINNERRX 7900 GRE1%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6850M XT
성능5958
효율성76100
Data confidence7560
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5958
76100
8880
커뮤니티 · 검증된 데이터
스트리머 구성 열기→스트리머가 사용하는 하드웨어
각 기기와 연결된 실제 공개 구성입니다.
AMDRX 7900 GRE0아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
AMDRadeon RX 6850M XT0아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
비교 결과
RX 7900 GRE is the best overall choice
RX 7900 GRE leads in combined gaming performance. RX 7900 GRE offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 7900 GRE leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 6850M XT costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 49–54of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
0 좋아요Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
91/100 · Price $549The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
종합 점수
개요
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
59Better
58
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
49Better
48
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
46
46
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
76
100Better
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
68Better
67
전체 비교
사양
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C—
DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C—
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS45.98Better13.21
TDP260 W165 WBetter
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8+8 pinNone
Release date20232022-01-04
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0BetterRDNA 2
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Launch price$549—
Shader units / Cores5120Better2560
Clock speed1500 - 2245 MHz2321–2581 MHzBetter
Base clock1500 MHz2321 MHzBetter
Boost clock2245 MHz2581 MHzBetter
Video memory16 GB GDDR6Better12 GB GDDR6
Memory clock18 GHz2250 MHzBetter
Memory bus256 bitBetter192 bit
Bandwidth576 GB/sBetter432 GB/s
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Power consumption260 W165 WBetter
Process node5 nmBetter7 nm
Recommended PSU600 W—
Length276 mm—
Die size529 mm²335 mm²Better
Memory cacheL1 250 KB, L2 6 MBL1 128 KB, L2 3 MB
Transistor count57700 millionBetter17200 million
게임 FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10059582%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10066652%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10067645%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100888010%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1007610027%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10072686%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10071676%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10067645%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10075707%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10068655%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0우수RDNA 2
Process node5 nm우수7 nm
Release date20232022-01-04
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count57700 million우수17200 million
Die size529 mm²335 mm²우수
Shader units / Cores5120우수2560
Base clock1500 MHz2321 MHz우수
Boost clock2245 MHz2581 MHz우수
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length276 mm—
ThicknessDual-slotIGP
Recommended PSU600 W—
Power connector8+8 pinNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C—
DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C—
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory16 GB GDDR6우수12 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus256 bit우수192 bit
TFLOPS45.98우수13.21
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6다른 비교
205NVIDIA리뷰 및 질문
AI 설명 · HEAD TO HEAD
이 비교 설명하기
퍼센트 이상의 설명: 각 차트의 원인, 관련 사양, 실제 영향을 분석합니다.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
실제 구성
소유자 경험
실제 빌드, 결과 및 커뮤니티 피드백.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
비교 자주 묻는 질문
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 7900 GRE or Radeon RX 6850M XT?+
RX 7900 GRE has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 7900 GRE offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 7900 GRE is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 7900 GRE is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 7900 GRE offers more overall performance, while RX 7900 GRE offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 7900 GRE is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 7900 GRE is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 7900 GRE leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 7900 GRE can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 7900 GRE is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 6850M XT is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 6850M XT is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 7900 GRE if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.