Radeon RX 7600MVSRadeon RX 6650M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 7600M+7%Better overall performance
AMD
Radeon RX 7600M
VSWINNERRadeon RX 7600M7%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 6650M
성능4641
효율성100100
Data confidence6969
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
4641
100100
6868
커뮤니티 · 검증된 데이터
스트리머 구성 열기→스트리머가 사용하는 하드웨어
각 기기와 연결된 실제 공개 구성입니다.
AMDRadeon RX 7600M0아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
AMDRadeon RX 6650M0아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
비교 결과
Radeon RX 7600M is the best overall choice
Radeon RX 7600M leads in combined gaming performance. Radeon RX 7600M offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
Radeon RX 7600M leads in the combined performance index
Prices are identical
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 125–130of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 7600M
0 좋아요Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 7600M
0/100 · Price $0The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
종합 점수
개요
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
46Better
41
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
40Better
36
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
37Better
34
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100
100
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
58Better
54
전체 비교
사양
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
TFLOPS17.27Better8.659
TDP90 WBetter120 W
ArchitectureRDNA 3BetterRDNA 2
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Launch price——
Shader units / Cores17921792
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Power connectorNoneNone
Release date2023-01-042022-01-04
Recommended PSU——
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Die size204 mm²Better237 mm²
Memory cacheL1 128 KB, L2 2 MBL1 128 KB, L2 2 MB
Clock speed1500–2410 MHz2068–2416 MHzBetter
Base clock1500 MHz2068 MHzBetter
Boost clock2410 MHz2416 MHzBetter
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory clock2000 MHzBetter1750 MHz
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
Bandwidth256 GB/sBetter224 GB/s
Power consumption90 WBetter120 W
Process node6 nmBetter7 nm
Transistor count13300 millionBetter11060 million
게임 FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 100464111%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10054516%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 10052496%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 10068680%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 1001001000%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 10056536%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 10055526%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 10052496%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 10058564%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 10053498%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX12.212.2
Vulkan1.41.4
OpenGL4.64.6
Upscaling——
Compute APIOpenCL 2.2OpenCL 2.1
Basic information
ArchitectureRDNA 3우수RDNA 2
Process node6 nm우수7 nm
Release date2023-01-042022-01-04
Device class——
Detailed specifications
Transistor count13300 million우수11060 million
Die size204 mm²우수237 mm²
Shader units / Cores17921792
Base clock1500 MHz2068 MHz우수
Boost clock2410 MHz2416 MHz우수
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length——
ThicknessIGPIGP
Recommended PSU——
Power connectorNoneNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory8 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit128 bit
TFLOPS17.27우수8.659
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6다른 비교
GTX 1630NVIDIA리뷰 및 질문
AI 설명 · HEAD TO HEAD
이 비교 설명하기
퍼센트 이상의 설명: 각 차트의 원인, 관련 사양, 실제 영향을 분석합니다.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
실제 구성
소유자 경험
실제 빌드, 결과 및 커뮤니티 피드백.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
비교 자주 묻는 질문
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: Radeon RX 7600M or Radeon RX 6650M?+
Radeon RX 7600M has the higher overall gaming score, while Radeon RX 7600M offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
Radeon RX 7600M is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
Radeon RX 7600M is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
Radeon RX 7600M offers more overall performance, while Radeon RX 7600M offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
Radeon RX 7600M is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
Radeon RX 7600M is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
Radeon RX 7600M leads in combined 1440p performance. Radeon RX 7600M can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
Radeon RX 7600M is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
Radeon RX 7600M is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
Radeon RX 7600M is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to Radeon RX 7600M if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.