Radeon RX 9050VSRadeon RX 7900M
Performance, specifications and real-world gaming comparison
♜ WINNERRadeon RX 9050+8%Better overall performance
AMD
RX 9050
VSWINNERRX 90508%H2H overall index
AMD
Radeon RX 7900M
성능5152
효율성10096
Data confidence6045
Fixed-scale H2H model. Missing metrics are omitted instead of estimated from the overall score.
SUMMARY PROFILE
Verified-metrics radar
Axes with missing data are hidden; every value uses a fixed scale.
AMDAMDPerformance
Efficiency
Memory capacity
5152
10096
6888
커뮤니티 · 검증된 데이터
스트리머 구성 열기→스트리머가 사용하는 하드웨어
각 기기와 연결된 실제 공개 구성입니다.
AMDRX 90500아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
AMDRadeon RX 7900M0아직 검증된 공개 구성이 없습니다
비교 결과
RX 9050 is the best overall choice
RX 9050 leads in combined gaming performance. RX 9050 offers the better price per frame, while the final choice depends on the required features, memory, and games.
RX 9050 leads in the combined performance index
Radeon RX 7900M costs less
CATALOG POSITION
Full ranking →Graphics card ranking
Positions 50–55of 723
COMPARISON VERDICT
Which should you choose?
Two practical conclusions based on community votes and gaming value.
Radeon RX 9050
0 좋아요Head to Head visitors currently choose this model more often.
Radeon RX 9050
86/100 · Price $399The choice is based on the price-to-performance index and launch price.
종합 점수
개요
Scores are calculated from specifications, performance, and efficiency.
GamesDirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan performance
51
52Better
Professional applications3D modeling, video editing, and rendering
43
44Better
AI and machine learningMachine-learning and AI capabilities
41
41
Power efficiencyPower consumption across workloads
100Better
96
Head to Head scoreOverall catalog score
67Better
62
전체 비교
사양
The better numeric value is highlighted in green, taking the metric direction into account.
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
DirectX—12.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
TFLOPS1838.52Better
TDP125 WBetter180 W
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Power connector8 pinNone
Release date20262023-10-19
Architecture—RDNA 3
Recommended PSU——
Length——
Thickness—IGP
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 2.2
Launch price——
Transistor count—57700 million
Die size—529 mm²
Shader units / Cores—4608
Memory cache—L1 250 KB, L2 6 MB
Clock speed1700 - 2600 MHz1825–2090 MHzBetter
Base clock1700 MHz1825 MHzBetter
Boost clock2600 MHzBetter2090 MHz
Video memory8 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6Better
Memory clock18 GHz2250 MHzBetter
Memory bus128 bit256 bitBetter
Bandwidth288 GB/s576 GB/sBetter
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Power consumption125 WBetter180 W
Process node4 nmBetter5 nm
게임 FPS
Loading test-rig results…
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H workload indices
Comparable internal indices on a fixed 0–100 scale.
H2H Raster IndexH2H Index / 10051522%
H2H Compute IndexH2H Index / 10059602%
H2H Rendering IndexH2H Index / 100566210%
H2H Memory Workload IndexH2H Index / 100688826%
H2H Efficiency IndexH2H Index / 100100964%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
HEAD TO HEAD · CALCULATED INDEX
H2H AI workload indices
Estimated workload profiles based on available performance and memory data.
H2H Image Generation IndexH2H Index / 100596814%
H2H ML Training IndexH2H Index / 100586613%
H2H Inference IndexH2H Index / 100566210%
H2H Local LLM IndexH2H Index / 100607218%
H2H Computer Vision IndexH2H Index / 100566312%
These are versioned H2H calculated indices derived from normalized catalog data. They are not results from 3DMark, Geekbench, Cinebench, PassMark, Blender, or another third-party benchmark.
API and SDK compatibility
DirectX—12.2
Vulkan—1.4
OpenGL—4.6
Upscaling——
Compute API—OpenCL 2.2
Basic information
Architecture—RDNA 3
Process node4 nm우수5 nm
Release date20262023-10-19
Detailed specifications
Transistor count—57700 million
Die size—529 mm²
Shader units / Cores—4608
Base clock1700 MHz1825 MHz우수
Boost clock2600 MHz우수2090 MHz
Form factor and compatibility
InterfacePCIe 5x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length——
Thickness—IGP
Recommended PSU——
Power connector8 pinNone
Connectivity and outputs
HDMI——
DisplayPort——
USB Type-C——
Max monitors——
Max resolution——
VRAM capacity and type
Video memory8 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR6우수
Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Memory bus128 bit256 bit우수
TFLOPS1838.52우수
HEAD TO HEAD · DISCOVER
6다른 비교
205NVIDIA리뷰 및 질문
AI 설명 · HEAD TO HEAD
이 비교 설명하기
퍼센트 이상의 설명: 각 차트의 원인, 관련 사양, 실제 영향을 분석합니다.
What AI will explain
Overall score, radar, FPS, synthetic tests, specifications, efficiency, and value.
실제 구성
소유자 경험
실제 빌드, 결과 및 커뮤니티 피드백.
♢Moderator reviewed☆Helpful to the community🏅Expert badges
비교 자주 묻는 질문
Short recommendations based on performance, memory, power consumption, and intended use.
01Which is better for gaming: RX 9050 or Radeon RX 7900M?+
RX 9050 has the higher overall gaming score, while RX 9050 offers the better price-to-performance ratio. The final choice depends on resolution and settings.
02Which is better for streaming?+
RX 9050 is the stronger streaming choice thanks to performance, hardware encoding, and application support. Check AV1, H.264, and HEVC support before buying.
03Which is better for Blender?+
RX 9050 is generally the better option for Blender and GPU rendering. Rendering-engine support and available VRAM also matter.
04Which is better for video editing?+
RX 9050 offers more overall performance, while RX 9050 offers more memory headroom. Codecs, hardware encoders, and editor optimization can change the result.
05Which is better for neural networks and AI?+
RX 9050 is the more practical option for local AI workloads. VRAM capacity, compute libraries, and framework compatibility are especially important.
06Which is better for 1080p?+
RX 9050 is the most rational 1080p choice, where high frame rates and cost per frame matter most.
07Which is better for 1440p?+
RX 9050 leads in combined 1440p performance. RX 9050 can be preferable for heavy textures and games with high VRAM usage.
08Which is better for 4K?+
RX 9050 is preferable for 4K, where total performance, memory bandwidth, and VRAM capacity have the greatest impact.
09Which is better for a quiet PC?+
RX 9050 is easier to use in a quiet build because of its lower estimated power and thermal load. Actual noise depends on the specific cooler.
10Which is better without replacing the power supply?+
RX 9050 is the safer candidate because its stated power consumption is lower. Verify PSU wattage, age, and power connectors.
11Is it worth upgrading from the previous generation?+
Consider upgrading to RX 9050 if your current device no longer delivers the required FPS, memory capacity, or feature support. A gain below 15–20% is usually worth waiting for a price cut.